Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Indicated stall speed question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Glasair-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
mppalmer(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:09 pm    Post subject: Indicated stall speed question Reply with quote

I was wondering what you GI FT and GII FT pilots (but not stretch or
SS) see for an indicated stall speed?

Our airspeed will drift down to about 65 KIAS and stay there throughout
the stall. (Power off, flaps up, for example.) I know that can't be
correct because it takes a while for the stall to occur and I can hear
the wind noise decreasing during that time. The airspeed should
continually be decreasing, but that's not the indication I get.

Apparently we have some kind of installation problem.

We have a combination pitot/static tube, as used on the old Viking
aircraft, that's mounted behind the main spar shear web. (I'm told this
is a $1000 part now. Sure doesn't work like it.) The static port never
did work right on the Glasair - you would take off and watch the
altimeter go below the runway as the static air wasn't! More
critically, I was never at Glide Slope crossing altitude on ILS
approaches. And that bothered me when it was for real.

So I moved the static ports to the aft fuselage, per a newsletter
article by John Levy. That pretty much solved the false altimeter
problem. But now I'm wondering if I'm getting a low pressure area
behind the rear windows in the stall configuration that causes the
airspeed in stall to read artificially high?

Last week I extended the pitot tube away from the wing a few inches so
that the tip is now 6 inches below the wing. I've only done one stall
in Phx thermal conditions. It didn't seem to make much difference in
the stall speed behavior.

I'm thinking of temporarily hooking the static side of the system to
the old hose that's hanging open inside the wing as an experiment.
Surely inside the wing ought to be a big lazy pool of static air?

In the meantime, I thought I'd ask the group if you're seeing any
bizarre stall speed behavior? Or had to do anything to solve this
problem?

I beta tested a Rite Angle AOA for Elbie Mendenhall years ago, and
installed it also about 6 inches below the wing on a streamlined tube
coming out of an inspection cover. We also got bizarre results. The AOA
would begin to increase a little as I would slow down but then hold the
same into the stall. We figured there was too much bow wave and we had
to move the probe about 10 inches away from the wing. But I never
tried that so we don't know.

Mike Palmer <><


- The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
Back to top
Craymondw(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:59 pm    Post subject: Indicated stall speed question Reply with quote

I built a Glasair2S FT and Cliff advised me to place my static ports near the middle of the fuselage and half way between the end of the rear window and the leading edge of the stabilizer. That was twenty years ago and now you have me wondering and will take measurements to be sure. My static ports consist of a plate on the out side that is connected to the fuse by three small bolts. I purchased them from AC Spruce. I added a three inch extension to my pitot and it is about five inches below the wing. I attached my pitot to the outer inspection plate. I am a little on the thick side and have never been able to understand what a knot is and have everything calibrated in MPH. With that in mind, my indicated flaps down stall speed is 63 mph and around 66 flaps up. I do show a discrepancy between my indicated air speed and GPS ground speed at cruise with my GPS showing a 10 mph faster speed than my indicated. I should add that my empty weight with seven quarts of oil is around 1,375 pounds and I weight 147 pounds. During my test flights I tried coming over the fence at 75 mph and found that I didn't have enough speed to flare with and the plane fell out of the air and I made a hard landing. So I increased the speed to 85 mph and that smoothed it out.
          Chuck Raymond N16CD
In a message dated 6/10/2012 12:09:38 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, mppalmer(at)aol.com writes:
Quote:
--> Glasair-List message posted by: mppalmer(at)aol.com

I was wondering what you GI FT and GII FT pilots (but not stretch or
SS) see for an indicated stall speed?

Our airspeed will drift down to about 65 KIAS and stay there throughout
the stall. (Power off, flaps up, for example.) I know that can't be
correct because it takes a while for the stall to occur and I can hear
the wind noise decreasing during that time. The airspeed should
continually be decreasing, but that's not the indication I get.

Apparently we have some kind of installation problem.

We have a combination pitot/static tube, as used on the old Viking
aircraft, that's mounted behind the main spar shear web. (I'm told this
is a $1000 part now. Sure doesn't work like it.) The static port never
did work right on the Glasair - you would take off and watch the
altimeter go below the runway as the static air wasn't! More
critically, I was never at Glide Slope crossing altitude on ILS
approaches. And that bothered me when it was for real.

So I moved the static ports to the aft fuselage, per a newsletter
article by John Levy. That pretty much solved the false altimeter
problem. But now I'm wondering if I'm getting a low pressure area
behind the rear windows in the stall configuration that causes the
airspeed in stall to read artificially high?

Last week I extended the pitot tube away from the wing a few inches so
that the tip is now 6 inches below the wing. I've only done one stall
in Phx thermal conditions. It didn't seem to make much difference in
the stall speed behavior.

I'm thinking of temporarily hooking the static side of the system to
the old hose that's hanging open inside the wing as an experiment.
Surely inside the wing ought to be a big lazy pool of static air?

In the meantime, I thought I'd ask the group if you're seeing any
bizarre stall speed behavior? Or had to do anything to solve this
problem?

I beta tested a Rite Angle AOA for Elbie Mendenhall years ago, and
installed it also about 6 inches below the wing on a streamlined tube
coming out of an inspection cover. We also got bizarre results. The AOA
would begin to increase a little as I would slow down but then hold the
same into the stall. We figured there was too much bow wave and we had
to move the probe about 10 inches away from the wing. But I never
tried that so we don't know.

Mike Palmer the ies ay - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site p;  


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Glasair-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Glasair-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Glasair-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group