Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Thermocouple test

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dave Saylor



Joined: 11 Jan 2015
Posts: 207
Location: GILROY, CA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 11:14 am    Post subject: Thermocouple test Reply with quote

I got into a little debate at work the other day about testing thermocouples.  The task is to check for a millivolt rise while heating each probe.  My coworker was checking for resistance and got a little defensive when I pointed out that it calls to check for millivolts.  The justification was "well, I use resistance".  He was seeing a change in resistance with heat applied.  I was seeing a change too, but I was looking at millivolts.
Now I'm wondering.  Does checking for resistance give a less valid result than checking for voltage?  The instructions just say to look for a rise in voltage, not any specific value.  Does a "rise" in millivolts give any better information than a change in resistance?  FWIW, the resistance was rising when heat was applied as well.
The system consists of four thermocouples in parallel.  Application is a helicopter engine.
Thanks for your help,
Dave


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

_________________
--Dave
KWVI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 12:55 pm    Post subject: Thermocouple test Reply with quote

At 02:13 PM 3/14/2023, you wrote:
Quote:
I got into a little debate at work the other day about testing thermocouples. The task is to check for a millivolt rise while heating each probe. My coworker was checking for resistance and got a little defensive when I pointed out that it calls to check for millivolts. The justification was "well, I use resistance". He was seeing a change in resistance with heat applied. I was seeing a change too, but I was looking at millivolts.

Now I'm wondering. Does checking for resistance give a less valid result than checking for voltage? The instructions just say to look for a rise in voltage, not any specific value. Does a "rise" in millivolts give any better information than a change in resistance? FWIW, the resistance was rising when heat was applied as well.

The system consists of four thermocouples in parallel. Application is a helicopter engine.

The procedure(s) you've described are gross
functionality tests to (1) show continuity across
the thermocouple and (2) verify that the thing
on the other end is indeed a thermocouple. I.e.
marked change of voltage with temperature.

These tests say nothing about calibration or accuracy
although if there is continuity, then there is little doubt
as to accuracy. Thermoelectric effects are kinda
molecular and not subject to 'drift'.

4 thermocouples in parallel, assuming similar
environments within the engine, will yield an
AVERAGE temperature measurement for the 4
items of interest. At the same time, testing
one of the 4 while still parallel connected
to the other 3 greatly reduces the sensitivity
of effects attributable to the one.

But you are correct . . . Thermocouples are
VOLTAGE generators with known scale factors
(millivolts per degree C change). An ohmmeter
deduces resistance of a conductor path by measuring
the voltage drop through that path when it's
'excited' by some test bias. Since the ohmmeter
is translating voltage values to displayed
resistance, it stands to reason that heating
a thermocouple connected to an ohmmeter would
manifest in a change of resistance reading.

But again, while this test says, "yeah, there
may be a thermocouple out there I'm seeing,"
it's no better or worse test of function than
simply looking for the generated voltage. It's
VOLTAGE that offers knowledge about what's
happening in the engine.


Bob . . .

  ////
  (o o)
===========o00o=(_)=o00o=========
< Go ahead, make my day . . . >
< show me where I'm wrong. >
=================================

In the interest of creative evolution
of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based
on physics and good practice.


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Dave Saylor



Joined: 11 Jan 2015
Posts: 207
Location: GILROY, CA

PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2023 1:31 pm    Post subject: Thermocouple test Reply with quote

Thanks Bob, that's just the kind of answer I was looking for.  We'll all talk about this and maybe each learn a bit.  --Dave

On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 1:57 PM Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:

Quote:
At 02:13 PM 3/14/2023, you wrote:
Quote:
I got into a little debate at work the other day about testing thermocouples.  The task is to check for a millivolt rise while heating each probe.  My coworker was checking for resistance and got a little defensive when I pointed out that it calls to check for millivolts.  The justification was "well, I use resistance".  He was seeing a change in resistance with heat applied.  I was seeing a change too, but I was looking at millivolts.

Now I'm wondering.  Does checking for resistance give a less valid result than checking for voltage?  The instructions just say to look for a rise in voltage, not any specific value.  Does a "rise" in millivolts give any better information than a change in resistance?  FWIW, the resistance was rising when heat was applied as well.

The system consists of four thermocouples in parallel.  Application is a helicopter engine.

  The procedure(s) you've described are gross
  functionality tests to (1) show continuity across
  the thermocouple and (2) verify that the thing
  on the other end is indeed a thermocouple. I.e.
  marked change of voltage with temperature.

  These tests say nothing about calibration or accuracy
  although if there is continuity, then there is little doubt
  as to accuracy. Thermoelectric effects are kinda
  molecular and not subject to 'drift'.

  4 thermocouples in parallel, assuming similar
  environments within the engine, will yield an
  AVERAGE temperature measurement for the 4
  items of interest.  At the same time, testing
  one of the 4 while still parallel connected
  to the other 3 greatly reduces the sensitivity
  of effects attributable to the one.

  But you are correct . . . Thermocouples are
  VOLTAGE generators with known scale factors
  (millivolts per degree C change). An ohmmeter
  deduces resistance of a conductor path by measuring
  the voltage drop through that path when it's
  'excited' by some test bias.  Since the ohmmeter
  is translating voltage values to displayed
  resistance, it stands to reason that heating
  a thermocouple connected to an ohmmeter would
  manifest in a change of resistance reading.

  But again, while this test says, "yeah, there
  may be a thermocouple out there I'm seeing,"
  it's no better or worse test of function than
  simply looking for the generated voltage. It's
  VOLTAGE that offers knowledge about what's
  happening in the engine.


  Bob . . .

                   ////
                  (o o)
   ===========o00o=(_)=o00o=========
   < Go ahead, make my day . . .   >
   < show me where I'm wrong.      >
   =================================
 
   In the interest of creative evolution
   of the-best-we-know-how-to-do based
   on physics and good practice.



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

_________________
--Dave
KWVI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group