Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Lightning- Bigger Engine

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Lightning-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cdewey6969(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 7:02 pm    Post subject: Lightning- Bigger Engine Reply with quote

Has anyone heard about the possibility of putting an
eight cylinder engine in the Lightning? Charles
Dewey

--- nick otterback <vettin74(at)yahoo.com> wrote:

Quote:
I belive the statement of terminal velocity in this
case is used in the wrong context....it was found
during testing with the esqual that a "Stock"
aircraft...all of their items no after market stuff;
gearleg, pressure recovery wheel pants,ect....that
the aircrafts total darg would not allow the
airframe accelerate much past 195 IAS at any
altitude not that TAS was higher ...and not taking
in to account the static system errors but the IAS
would not accelerate.....now i did do alot of
testing poweron ...below redline RPM and at idle
...the only differance is it took longer and a
steeper angle at idle.......the hybrid would go to
about 210 but not much more .....and the prototype
lightning will find the end of ASI without any
problem...245IAS....VNE is not related to the
aircrafts drag curve directly it may be mearly that
the nubers are the same....but not related .....it
is just that the airframe can not accelerate past
that AS in its current form......the prototype is
clean enough to fly that fast with out induced drag
being much of limiting facor but the aircraft lacks
the power to pull it much past 205 in level flight
.....I am sure this sheds some light but more than
likley opens up another can...

Nick

N1BZRich(at)aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 10/8/2006 12:42:55 P.M.
Eastern Daylight Time, dashvii(at)hotmail.com writes:
It was at an altitude of about 12,000 feet
starting, power to idle, nose
down to about 30 degrees and then steeper. I
couldn't get anymore out of it
with power at idle.

So the total drag of the Esqual you were flying
was the real culprit. Total meaning wings,
fuselage, gear leg fairings, wheel pants, cowling,
etc. Also, with the engine in idle with the prop
wind milling would add to the drag total as well.
It would have been interesting to do the same test
in 424EA - the hybrid Esqual with the Lightning
wings. But I certainly agree with your bottom line
that the Lightning wing is a considerably lower drag
wing than the Esqual wing.
Buz




---------------------------------
Get your email and more, right on the new Yahoo.com

__________________________________________________


- The Matronics Lightning-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Lightning-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group