  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 7:33 am    Post subject: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, etc) | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 02:36 AM 6/10/2016, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "gfb" <fly(at)bappos.com>
 
  Initial thoughts on electrical system for my RV9, hoping to get some feedback from you folks. I do have some questions below but please feel free to chime in with anything else you feel is valuable.
 
  - On the fence about some sort of avionics switch. Most of the big items installed don’t have on-off switches on them so I can’t keep them off during engine start. I understand the single point of failure problem so I have been avoiding it but it sure would be nice. | 	  
    What is the foundation for needing one in the first place?
 
   	  | Quote: | 	 		   
  - Safe to put both trim motors on the same breaker? The GAD27 install manual recommends 2 5A breakers but does not indicate why. Seems like a waste of a breaker to me   | 	  
    "Safe" is an un-quantified term in aviation . . . airplanes
    are dangerous as (at)#$$. We design and choose parts that drive
    risks lower . . . but they are never zero. So the answer to
    your question is, what are additional hazards for having both trims
    disabled from the same fault? I suspect they are vanishingly
    small. So if you're crowded for breaker space, then drive on.
    Remember, 99.99$% of all breakers and fuses in vehicles of
    any time sit there for the lifetime of the airplane never having
    been called upon to do their job: protect a wire.
 
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  - Any other spots I could save a breaker? I feel that I’m too granular with them but can’t figure out where to… trim…   Maybe Nav+Strobes, Servos+GMC, AudioPanel+GTR20? | 	  
    Why not fuse blocks of generous size mounted out of the
    way but in sufficient quantity to offer independent
    protection for every feeder . . . with unassigned slots
    as spares for future expansion?
 
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  | - What is the preferred method to set up the sd-8 to come on by itself? I have heard setting it's regulator voltage low is pretty common? What should that be set to? | 	  
    Why do this? When the low voltage light comes on
    you say, "Aw shucks!". Finish the cup of coffee,
    fold up the map, tell the passenger that the
    little yellow light is no big deal. Then flip
    a few switches to bring your second engine driven
    power source into service.  The hazards for main
    alternator are not grounded in real risk to
    comfortable termination of flight. It's the un
    founded belief that it's a hazard that drive up
    your pucker-factor.
 
  - The e-bus relay should see a peak of 20A with typical below 15A. I’m considering the B&C with the 25A heat sink?
 
    20A ebus? How did this get BIGGER than the SD-8 output?
 
  
 
  
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		gfb
 
 
  Joined: 07 Jun 2016 Posts: 4
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jun 12, 2016 12:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, e | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				On avionics switch, would be interesting to have most avionics off while cranking the engine.
 
 For the Trim breaker, Ray Allen indicates that a single 1A would be enough for both trim motors. This sounds odd considering Garmin recommended a 5A for each.
 
 Yeah, I'm probably going to brake a few items out into fuse blocks. I'm thinking exterior lights get one, LRUs, Cabin Power, and maybe one other. Is it reasonable to have these fuse blocks have a pull breaker on the panel?
 i.e. Ext Lights panel breaker for 20A goes to a fuse block behind the panel with fuses for each light.
 Is this reasonable?
 
 The e-bus has a peak that exceeds the SD-8. This only happens if everything is on at once, including the boost pump running, the radio transmitting, both servos moving and trimming, and a dead ibbs battery charging. This will likely never happen, definitely not for any amount of time longer than a second or so. The normal draw for the bus should be about 6A with it maybe going up to 10-15A on landing. I'm looking at the SD-8 as more of a battery extender than a full redundant alternator.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Jun 13, 2016 4:17 am    Post subject: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, etc) | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 03:46 PM 6/12/2016, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "gfb" <fly(at)bappos.com>
 
  On avionics switch, would be interesting to have most
  avionics off while cranking the engine. | 	  
    The idea behind the avionics master switch
    was birthed about 1965 when transistors were
    first starting to show up in the radios.
    Compared to today's hardware, batteries were
    relatively soggy 'soggy' devices. We were 
    'killing' radios in brand new airplanes
    before they left the factory.
 
    The real physics behind those failures was
    poorly understood. See  http://tinyurl.com/hye6mpe
 
    Today's batteries are more robust as are the
    radios themselves. All things potentially
    hazardous to the community of silicon devices
    are well known and easily managed. Today,
    there is nothing that any vehicular dc 
    power system can throw at a properly
    applied transistor that puts the device
    at-risk.
 
  
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  | For the Trim breaker, Ray Allen indicates that a single 1A would be enough for both trim motors. This sounds odd considering Garmin recommended a 5A for each. | 	  
    Breakers/fuses protect wires. You're
    probably not going to wire with anything
    smaller than 22AWG for which 5A is the
    recommended protection. While 1A protection
    for both is 'enough', 5A protection is not
    'too much' based not on what's at the end
    of the wire but based on the wire size alone.
 
    The decisions for wire sizing/protection
    are going to be simple . . . the more
    difficult part is to craft an architecture
    that produces the most failure tolerant
    design based on the airplane's flight
    handling qualities and how you intend to
    use the airplane. In most instances, loss
    of one or both trim systems does not
    present an especially risky situation.
    On the other hand, protecting each system
    independently of each other is easy and
    likelihood of ANY protective device being
    tripped is exceedingly low.
 
  
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  Yeah, I'm probably going to brake a few items out into fuse blocks. I'm thinking exterior lights get one, LRUs, Cabin Power, and maybe one other. Is it reasonable to have these fuse blocks have a pull breaker on the panel?
  i.e. Ext Lights panel breaker for 20A goes to a fuse block behind the panel with fuses for each light.
  Is this reasonable? | 	  
    Why any breakers at all? They're expensive,
    take up panel space, have no useful purpose
    to the pilot in operating the aircraft. They
    force you to route wires to relatively
    unhandy places while increasing weight.
    See   http://tinyurl.com/hjkqsto
 
    I proposed a shift from breakers back to
    fuses in aircraft about 20 years ago. Since
    that time, many failure tolerant airplanes
    have been crafted with no breakers at a
    substantial savings of weight, cost and
    build time. 
 
  
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  | The e-bus has a peak that exceeds the SD-8. This only happens if everything is on at once, including the boost pump running, the radio transmitting, both servos moving and trimming, and a dead ibbs battery charging. This will likely never happen, definitely not for any amount of time longer than a second or so. The normal draw for the bus should be about 6A with it maybe going up to 10-15A on landing. I'm looking at the SD-8 as more of a battery extender than a full redundant alternator. | 	  
    You've done a load analysis . . . great!
    The loads you describe do not suggest the need
    for a relay . . . a toggle switch will handle
    them nicely. If a relay is necessary, something
    like this is entirely appropriate to the task
 
   http://tinyurl.com/hdmkvvt
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		gfb
 
 
  Joined: 07 Jun 2016 Posts: 4
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:14 am    Post subject: Re: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, e | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				OK, I think I see your point on not needing breakers and going with fuses but I'm not 100% there yet. For my personal sense of comfort I'd like to have items on the endurance bus on breakers. Does this seem like a reasonable compromise? It allows me to load-shed even further by pulling breakers if needed and uses much fewer breakers and panel space. Thoughts?
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		gfb
 
 
  Joined: 07 Jun 2016 Posts: 4
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:24 am    Post subject: Re: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, e | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Does the rest of the circuit seem reasonable? 
 
 Could you elaborate on the e-bus switch vs relay? Up to what amperage is it ok for it to be a regular switch? I was planning on using the S700 Carling switches sold by b&c and they claim 15A VAC but a quick search for them seems to bring up more failure posts than details on the switches. Is there a better option?
 
 For the fuse blocks I'm looking at the ones sold by b&c and they come in different sizes. Does it make sense to have 2 or 3 to split up the load a bit? Where should they feed from? i.e. should I have one large wire for the firewall passthrough and then split that up somewhere between the fuse blocks?
 
 Thanks!
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		user9253
 
 
  Joined: 28 Mar 2008 Posts: 1944 Location: Riley TWP Michigan
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jun 14, 2016 2:10 pm    Post subject: Re: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, e | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				One advantage of relays is remote control.  The relay can be located close to the battery.  In the event of smoke in the cockpit or an imminent forced landing, power can be shut off at the source without having hot wires entering the cockpit.  Switch the negative side of the relay like the battery contactor.
   I can not remember the brand, but their switches used rivets to conduct electrons from inside of the housing to the outside.  The problem was that the plastic case was part of the sandwich that the rivet held together.  The plastic flowed over time which allowed the rivets to loosen.  That led to resistance and heat and failure.
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Joe Gores | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 12:12 pm    Post subject: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, etc) | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 02:14 PM 6/14/2016, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "gfb" <fly(at)bappos.com>
 
  OK, I think I see your point on not needing breakers and going with fuses but I'm not 100% there yet. For my personal sense of comfort I'd like to have items on the endurance bus on breakers. Does this seem like a reasonable compromise?  | 	  
    Compromise for what? If a breaker ever opens it means
    something is broke . . . and that something threatens
    to set a wire on fire. You want to give it a second
    chance?
 
    What items in your airplane are high priority equipment
    for comfortable termination of flight? From that list
    of items, how many of them can fail in ways that do not
    open a breaker?  I can tell you that the vast majority
    of equipment failures never open a breaker . . . if that
    item is so necessary/useful that you're worried about
    being able to reclose a breaker, then you'd better have
    a plan-b . . . a back up for when the system decides
    to take a vacation.
 
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  | It allows me to load-shed even further by pulling breakers if needed and uses much fewer breakers and panel space. Thoughts? | 	  
    Load shed? What's the e-bus for? The LAST thing
    you should be doing in flight is running any kind
    of mental gymnastics calculated to reduce risks
    of dealing with some kind of failure. ALL such
    things are done at THIS phase of your design
    and fabrication. Should a necessary item go T.U.
    then you go to plan-b. If the item is not necessary,
    then there is no plan-B.
 
    The idea behind the e-bus is to do a two-switch
    load shed that either (1) does not overtax an
    SD-8 or (2) produces a KNOWN endurance value
    running battery only based on periodic capacity
    checks of your battery.
 
    Messing with any breaker or fuse in flight is a
    demonstration of poor planning that should have
    been managed during THIS phase of your project's
    development. Put the fuse blocks out of sight and
    out of mind. Deal with system difficulties as a
    pilot with a plan . . . not an in-flight diagnostician
    and maintenance technician.
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jun 15, 2016 2:38 pm    Post subject: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, etc) | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | Could you elaborate on the e-bus switch vs relay? Up to what amperage is it ok for it to be a regular switch? | 	  
    Sure. Any generic toggle switch of any rating
    is unlikely to be overstressed in your airplane.
 
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  |  I was planning on using the S700 Carling switches sold by b&c and they claim 15A VAC but a quick search for them seems to bring up more failure posts than details on the switches. Is there a better option? | 	  
    The Carling switches sold by B&C are direct descendants of
    those used by the hundreds of thousands on Cessna and Piper
    aircraft for decades. What details are you lacking? Keep
    in mind that nobody posts about their working switches . . .
    only the ones that have presented some problem . . .
    hence, a dozen posts of problems over a period of years
    may have the appearance of describing a quality issue.
 
    Switches, like every other device or bit of material
    in your project, are subject to failure . . . nothing
    lasts forever. Switches on personally owned airplanes
    have nearly zero service stress compared to, say the
    light switch in your bathroom.
 
    When doing the failure modes analysis for your
    project the questions to be asked are:
 
     How can this part fail?
     How will I know that it has failed?
     Is the failure pre-flight detectable?
 
   The answer to the third question drives your architecture and checklist decisions.
 
     Does failure present some degree of elevated   risk for uncomfortable termination of flight?
 
   The answer to the fourth question drives your decisions for having a plan-b assuming that the part will fail.
   The beauty and comfort to be secured by an artfully crafted FMEA is that you don't care if the part fails . . . it's not an issue of increased risk. It's only effect is a cost-of-ownership. You might upgrade a part because you're tired of replacing it . . . not because it #(at)%%(at)% near got you killed.
   THAT is failure tolerant design . . . stone simple, cheap, easy to do.
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  |  For the fuse blocks I'm looking at the ones sold by b&c and they come in different sizes. Does it make sense to have 2 or 3 to split up the load a bit? Where should they feed from? i.e. should I have one large wire for the firewall passthrough and then split that up somewhere between the fuse blocks? | 	  
     Generally, each block represents one bus. In figure
     Z-13/8 you need three. Battery, Main and E-bus blocks.
     Other architectures will call for more or fewer
     blocks. Install blocks larger than needed today
     to allow for easy, future expansion.
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		wgreenley
 
 
  Joined: 09 Jan 2010 Posts: 100 Location: Dowagiac, MI
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jun 16, 2016 5:38 am    Post subject: Review request for RV-9 Electrical   System (G3X, GTN, etc) | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				One place on my Cessna I have found a breaker VERY useful is the 12v power port (aka Cigarette lighter). Sometimes items with too big a draw get plugged in and blow the breaker, remove item, reset, and can still use other items in flight. 
  
 From: owner-aeroelectric-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-aeroelectric-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Robert L. Nuckolls, III
 Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 4:11 PM
 To: aeroelectric-list(at)matronics.com
 Subject: Re: Re: Review request for RV-9 Electrical System (G3X, GTN, etc)
  
 At 02:14 PM 6/14/2016, you wrote:
 --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "gfb" <fly(at)bappos.com (fly(at)bappos.com)>
 
 OK, I think I see your point on not needing breakers and going with fuses but I'm not 100% there yet. For my personal sense of comfort I'd like to have items on the endurance bus on breakers. Does this seem like a reasonable compromise? 
 
   Compromise for what? If a breaker ever opens it means
   something is broke . . . and that something threatens
   to set a wire on fire. You want to give it a second
   chance?
 
   What items in your airplane are high priority equipment
   for comfortable termination of flight? From that list
   of items, how many of them can fail in ways that do not
   open a breaker?  I can tell you that the vast majority
   of equipment failures never open a breaker . . . if that
   item is so necessary/useful that you're worried about
   being able to reclose a breaker, then you'd better have
   a plan-b . . . a back up for when the system decides
   to take a vacation.
 
 It allows me to load-shed even further by pulling breakers if needed and uses much fewer breakers and panel space. Thoughts?
 
   Load shed? What's the e-bus for? The LAST thing
   you should be doing in flight is running any kind
   of mental gymnastics calculated to reduce risks
   of dealing with some kind of failure. ALL such
   things are done at THIS phase of your design
   and fabrication. Should a necessary item go T.U.
   then you go to plan-b. If the item is not necessary,
   then there is no plan-B.
 
   The idea behind the e-bus is to do a two-switch
   load shed that either (1) does not overtax an
   SD-8 or (2) produces a KNOWN endurance value
   running battery only based on periodic capacity
   checks of your battery.
 
   Messing with any breaker or fuse in flight is a
   demonstration of poor planning that should have
   been managed during THIS phase of your project's
   development. Put the fuse blocks out of sight and
   out of mind. Deal with system difficulties as a
   pilot with a plan . . . not an in-flight diagnostician
   and maintenance technician.
 
   Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |