Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Accurate arm measurements for W&B

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dan(at)syz.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 4:01 pm    Post subject: Accurate arm measurements for W&B Reply with quote

Hi everyone. I have something of a "heads up" for people (unless it's more of a "heads up" for me, if I've done something wrong Smile

In comparing my W&B numbers to others who have published theirs, I realized that many people seem to be using the arm measurement for the wheels as given by Van's in their "Sample W&B" information (right: 124.44", left: 124.31", front: 50.44"). Since it's unlikely that everyone's measurements match Van's exactly to the hundredth of an inch, I assume most people are just assuming that since the RV-10 is designed so that a person can't help but build it right, Van's numbers should be close enough to theirs.

But out of curiosity, I decided to measure mine, as accurately as possible, with the door frame/fuselage longeron (Van's level datum line) perfectly level.... and I ended up with somewhat different measurements. On my RV-10, I measured right: 123.07", left: 123.19", front: 50.32". The front wheel is pretty close to the same place as Van's, but the rear mains are slightly more than an inch different. I'm not sure why the difference is as big as it is - maybe Van's measured theirs after the wheel struts had flexed a bit over time.... maybe they measured their arms when the aircraft was not empty (which would also cause the struts to flex and move the mains aft).... or maybe there is some tolerance in parts.

But whatever the reason, I think it's probably important that when doing a W&B, the weights and arms are measured for your particular aircraft - don't use the weights for your aircraft but the arms from Van's example data. And it does make a difference - using my weights and arms, I end up with an empty CG at 108.2". Using my weights and Van's sample arms, I'd have an empty CG at 109.2". An inch off in calculations of empty CG might be notable considering there is only a 8.4" window in CG in the first place.

If anyone else has measured the arms to their mains and nose gear, I'd be interested in hearing what numbers you came up with.

Dan
---
Dan Charrois
President, Syzygy Research & Technology
Phone: 780-961-2213


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group