Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS the questio

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Aug 14, 2017 9:30 am    Post subject: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS the questio Reply with quote

At 10:00 AM 8/13/2017, you wrote:
Quote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "kearney" <kearney(at)shaw.ca>

Charlie

Your comment on the OV nuisance trip is interesting. How does one tell if the OV was a temporary, non-threatening excursion or if it is the result of something serious? Resetting the breaker seems risky.

If there's a real trip of the ov protection system
then resetting one time does not represent a big
risk . . . the ov excursion is well under DO160
limits.


Quote:
Dave's comment about being able to isolate the field field when ship's power is on without the engine makes sense. In that case I wounder if a switch and a fuse would be better. Pulling breakers seems a bit kludgy.

The z-figures have offered TWO approaches to dC
POWER master switches.

One with the three position master where mid position
is battery only, up position is battery+altenrator

[img]cid:7.1.0.9.0.20170814122057.0708bde0(at)aeroelectric.com.0[/img]


In this case, battery only ops are easily
established with just the switch.

In the past, we've shown that DC PWR MASTER
could be a simple DPST toggle that brings
battery and alternator on together. In
this case, having a field breaker rather
than fuse made it possible to set up
battery only maintenance ops on the ground.

OF course, if the ship was fitted with crowbar
ov protection, then the breaker was already
in place.




Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



14ebad8b.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  36.02 KB
 Viewed:  2103 Time(s)

14ebad8b.jpg


Back to top
kearney



Joined: 20 Sep 2008
Posts: 563

PostPosted: Tue Aug 15, 2017 6:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Alternators - To Fuse or not to fuse - That IS the que Reply with quote

Hi Bob

Thank you for the helpful comments. I will likely go with a battery bus and CBs on the Alternator fields. As I also plan to use the B&C volt regulators shown in the Z12, I will also have the requisite OV protection.

Cheers

Les


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group