Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

#41 drill bit.. is it really better?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rv10builder(at)verizon.ne
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 10:35 am    Post subject: #41 drill bit.. is it really better? Reply with quote

I know the difference between 40 and 41 in minor but anyone know if we want
a tighter hole? I would think as the rivet expands as it is being squeezed
to the correct length that it would put a slight more pressure on the
smaller hole and possibly create a stress crack? or is smaller really
better?

---


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
owl40188(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:20 pm    Post subject: #41 drill bit.. is it really better? Reply with quote

I don't have any specific data but slightly more pressure is probably good. It sets up a tensile residual stress field around the hole which helps with fatigue life. Now I don't know this for a fact as far as rivets go, however, with bolts, we normally use interference fit fasteners if we need to improve the fatigue life of a part just for that reason. Its based on the principle that if you take a piece of metal and overload it in tension then its fatigue life will improve assuming that the fatigue loading is lower. Don't try this on your airplane because if you really load it in compression it will have the opposite effect. Such a case would be a really hard landing with full fuel where the lower skin/ spar cap will be in compression. That would set up a compressive residual stress and reduce the fatigue life of the skin/ lower spar cap.

I don't know but I might have told you more than you were interested in knowing.

happy building

Niko
40188
---


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
jeff(at)westcottpress.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 14, 2006 2:50 pm    Post subject: #41 drill bit.. is it really better? Reply with quote

For what it's worth, I've used a #40 ream where both holes were already pre-punched and a 41 bit followed by a 40 ream when they weren't.  In the brief discussions I've had with Vans about this topic, I get the sense that they find it amusing that the builders get so wrapped up in this kind of detail.  They really just want us to drill to #40, and dimple... just like they call out in the plans.  If they wanted us to do something different, they would have said it.
I've been down this road, and it leads to "just build the plane."
Jeff Carpenter
40304

On Dec 14, 2006, at 2:20 PM, Niko wrote:
[quote]I don't have any specific data but slightly more pressure is probably good.  It sets up a tensile residual stress field around the hole which helps with fatigue life.  Now I don't know this for a fact as far as rivets go, however, with bolts, we normally use interference fit fasteners if we need to improve the fatigue life of a part just for that reason.  Its based on the principle that if you take a piece of metal and overload it in tension then its fatigue life will improve assuming that the fatigue loading is lower.  Don't try this on your airplane because if you really load it in compression it will have the opposite effect.  Such a case would be a really hard landing with full fuel where the lower skin/ spar cap will be in compression.  That would set up a compressive residual stress and reduce the fatigue life of the skin/ lower spar cap. 
 
I don't know but I might have told you more than you were interested in knowing.
 
happy building
 
Niko
40188
---


- The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV10-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group