wcurtis(at)core.com
Guest
|
 Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 9:34 am Post subject: No Title |
 |
|
[quote]Is that the "only" think you can conclude? What about the objective facts? >For example, I also concluded that there are functional differences such as >"you can't enter an airway into the 430". A fact - correct? Why, after all >the diatribe, do you brush away all the facts and revert to subjective >personal opinion? Worse yet, you revert to public opinion/market economics >rather than sound science/engineering? Perhaps a proven political move - >but very bad science/engineering! rtitsworth, Since you haven't figured it out, that was my way of saying that this debate is pointless. Again, If you go back and RE-READ my first post, I stated this very fact--there is no need for a conclusion on that since this was never debated. I am searching for a new fact, science/engineering in your post. Tell me what facts I have brushed away? I'm also still waiting for someone to tell me what negative or non "sound science/engineering" comments I'm made regarding the 480. William Curtis http://wcurtis.nerv10.com/ [quote][b]
| | - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - | | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |
|
|
|
Get Email Distribution Too!
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
