Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Rule 1 in aviation, Renamed Aviation Securtiy

Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

PostPosted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 11:06 pm    Post subject: Rule 1 in aviation, Renamed Aviation Securtiy Reply with quote


If we were not so afraid of being politically correct, there would be plenty
of money for Air Marshals. We are spending all of our money, scrutinizing people
who are not going to hijack airplanes (Dick Butkis, Ray Charles, Ect. . . ).
Yes I saw these people singled out for extra scrutiny when I was working security
at LAX.

The FFDO program is probably one of the cheapest programs we have, with real
potential at accomplishing something. At least we are not targeting innocent
individuals with the FFDO program.

If we concentrated our resources on the profile (yes a nasty word) of terrorist,
we could have half the security and prevent acts of terrorism. We also need
to stop Muslims from coming to this country until we find a better way of telling
who is coming to kill us! (show me where the constitution says I have to let
someone in to this country to kill me!!!!).

Israel does their Security right; they have learned over the last 30 years of
dealing with terrorist.

Fly Safe
John Fischer


So why doesn't the FFDO fly the plane and let the passengers kill the >terrorists?
Even if the 100-300 passengers failed to subdue the five >terrorists, the plane

would remain under control (e.g. NOT crash into a >skyscraper) and all would
be well.

Or we could put two sky marshalls on the plane. It can't be done, you >say?
No airliner takes off without two pilots and at least three flight >attendants.

How is it possible to mandate that and not be able to >mandate two sky marshals?
Cost? Cops come cheaper than airline pilots, >so if the flight can afford
two pilots, how much would the trip total >cost go up with two sky marshals?
A percent or two, maybe.

The FFDO program is as poorly conceived and implemented as the rest of >the
TSA's post-911 panic reaction.


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group