Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Wooden aircraft vs. metal

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Homebuilt-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chris In Marshfield



Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 87

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:09 am    Post subject: Wooden aircraft vs. metal Reply with quote

Hi all,

I've had my eye on several wooden aircraft as of late, one being completely wooden, and a couple having wooden wings and metal bodies. I've started considering them as potential project candidates because I've got plenty of woodworking tools, but would have to invest in a fair amount of tooling if I were to build a sheetmetal aircraft or an aircraft with sheetmetal wings.

At first, from reading various articles and postings here and there across the Net, I'd have thought that the cost to construct a wooden aircraft would be less than a metal one. However, after looking at the current prices of wood versus the sheets of aluminum, it doesn't look like I'd be gaining much in the way of cost savings (tool costs not withstanding). But I haven't done a complete cost analysis since I don't have any particular wooden aircraft plans to work with.

Does anyone here have experience with both types that can offer any kind of comparison between them, cost or otherwise? I'm not tied to any particular construction method, but am partial to high-wing aircraft such as the Bearhawk (disclaimer: I have plans for this one in hand), Christavia Mk-IV, Falconar S14 Maranda, and Bakeng Deuce.

Thanks for any thoughts you may have.

Best regards,
Chris


- The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List

_________________
Chris Owens
Waunakee, WI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
steve(at)byu.edu
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:24 am    Post subject: Wooden aircraft vs. metal Reply with quote

Chris,
Just get started. Forget about counting cost. I have neither time or
money and I still do it. Any costs you can anticipate will be
overshadowed by unforeseen ones later. If you really are concerned
about steel vs Aluminum vs wood, buy someones' half-finished project.
Every material has gone up in price since I started in this hobby 10
years ago. It is still worth it. I started by building a pietenpol for
$5000 in materials, including engine and paint. I bet I could still do
it for less than $10K.

Advice: worth what you paid for it....
Steve E

--


- The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List
Back to top
EuropaXSA276(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2007 5:40 pm    Post subject: Wooden aircraft vs. metal Reply with quote

Chris:
Have you considered a composite aircraft? Many of your on hand wood working tools and skills will apply to that type of construction.
In my humble opinion you get the best bang for the buck with composite construction.
But the other gentleman had it right. Start a project that you want to fly. You are in this for the long haul and the money does not go away all at once. So build something that will keep your interest for a number of years. That's how long it will take to build the darn thing!

Brian Skelly
Europa XS TriGear #A276
North Texas USA
You can see my build photos at:
http://www.europaowners.org/BrianS

See what's free at AOL.com.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List
Back to top
Float Flyr



Joined: 19 Jul 2006
Posts: 2704
Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 4:19 am    Post subject: Wooden aircraft vs. metal Reply with quote

When I was teenager my father built a Volmer Jensen Design VJ22 Sportsman
Amphib. This was a wood fuselage but he installed Aeronca Champ wings. As
I remember it too get everything to fit right took about ten hours of
thinking for every hour of actual doing. I lot of the "grunt" work I got to
do. While dad did all the fitting and planning into shape.

The most difficult part of the actual hands on work was getting the aircraft
grade mahogany plywood and then driving those tiny soft brass nails through
such incredibly hard wood. Every joint was glued with waterproof resorcinol
glue, Nailed with brass nails (much longer than tacks) and then clamped
tightly until the glue set.

After all the wood work was done there was a lot of finish work done with
fibre glass. When you get to that stage I can recommend a good sealed suit
to keep the dust from getting into your clothes. And a good respirator. The
new epoxies in some ways are far superior and easier materials to work with
than the old poly-urethane but you can develop a sensitivity to them very
easily.

Some of the metal planes are self jigging (Zenith) and except for the
compressor and the riveter should be buildable with the tools found around a
well equipped garage. I won't tell you they can be built with a Swiss army
knife as the first line tool. But construction should be fairly easily if
you pay very close attention to the construction manual. There's lots of
grunt work there too. I figure about a bazillion holes have to be de-burred
edges rounded and chamfered Etc.Etc.

If you don't mind buying a frame, tube and rag will probably get you in the
air the fastest. I only recommend starting from a supply of 4130 steel tube
if you are a very accomplished welder and have all the welding equipment.
That type of construction lends itself more to assembly but there is still a
surprising amount of fabrication that needs to be done.

Composite aircraft really need to be bought in kit form. The building of
moulds for a "one of plane is immensely expen$$$$ive!!! Bought as a kit you
can have a great plane. The important thing is to ensure all your glue
joints are good with no voids any where Again a proper Composites closed
suit and respirator will be a first line requirement. Bring money, a lot of
these designs also like to use large engines to drive the planes even
faster!

Depending on the type of flying you expect to be doing you may want to check
into the "Sport Pilot" class of aviation. Planes are small, relatively
inexpensive compared to GA, available BUT there are many restrictions which
you personally may find too limiting.

On April 12, 2007 that's the way I see it.

Good luck

Noel

[quote] --


- The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List

_________________
Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Chris In Marshfield



Joined: 26 May 2006
Posts: 87

PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 7:39 am    Post subject: Re: Wooden aircraft vs. metal Reply with quote

I appreciate your thoughts and insights, everyone.

It seems everyone has their own favorite airframe type, and that's great. Each has its own advantages.

From what I can see and from the replies I've seen here, there's really no cost benefit of choosing one form over another. Each is fraught with monetary peril and has its own set of advantages, so I should just choose the aircraft I like the most and roll with it.

Now I just have to explain all the good stuff to my wife Very Happy

Thanks and best regards,
Chris


- The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List

_________________
Chris Owens
Waunakee, WI
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jpl(at)showpage.org
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:08 am    Post subject: Wooden aircraft vs. metal Reply with quote

Chris,

If cost is the overdriving concern but you want a "real" airplane (as
opposed to something made out of tube and fabric and a lawnmower-
sized engine), then my recommendation would be to consider choice of
engines.

The RV-9 can be built more economically than some other airplanes out
there, but still gives you fabulous performance. The economy comes
from allowing a smaller, less expensive engine.

Stick in a basic VFR-only panel and you don't have to spend an arm
and a leg.

Another choice would be to first find an engine, then pick a design
that takes the engine.

If you manage the cost of the panel (which can be done if you go
basic VFR), then the next biggest cost is usually the engine. The
engine for my -6A will cost more than the airframe (at least that
part of the airframe that goes to Van's). Your biggest savings comes
from smart engine choice.

-Joe

On Apr 12, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Chris In Madison wrote:

Quote:

<cowens(at)cnw.com>

I appreciate your thoughts and insights, everyone.

It seems everyone has their own favorite airframe type, and that's
great. Each has its own advantages.

> From what I can see and from the replies I've seen here, there's
> really no cost benefit of choosing one form over another. Each is
> fraught with monetary peril and has its own set of advantages, so
> I should just choose the aircraft I like the most and roll with it.

Now I just have to explain all the good stuff to my wife Very Happy

Thanks and best regards,
Chris

--------


- The Matronics Homebuilt-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Homebuilt-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Homebuilt-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group