Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

74 inch verse 72 inch

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV7-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rv7a.builder(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:04 pm    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

Hello Group,

I am about to order the engine and prop for my
RV-7A. The Hartzell constant speed prop comes either
72" or 74". Ken at Van's could not give me a
compelling reason to go either way with a nose wheel
plane. Does the group have any thoughts?. Thanks. JR

__________________________________________________


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
klwerner(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:10 pm    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

I'd go 74"
[quote] ---


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
tylerii(at)infoave.net
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:21 am    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

74 is more noise a lot more...maybe a little better climb....less groung
clearance....no real cruise improvement.... I went with 72 inch on a RV7A
with IO360/180 w/LS PII
TANGOBRAVO

--


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
klwerner(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 6:50 am    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

Good points, the ground clearance is 1" less on the 74", but I believe (don't hold me to it) the service limit is 72" on these props, so if you ever would damage the 72" with a need to cut it down a bit, you are already there!!! The 74" has an inch on each blade that you could work with. It should also have a little bit more thrust (theoretically) then the 72". It is your choice, and do not archive

[quote] ---


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
rv7a.builder(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 7:36 am    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

Given all the considerations, noise would be a factor
to consider when all other performance data is
virtually undetectable? I just wonder why a
manufacturer would go to the expense of having another
model of prop, in this case the 74", without some
advantage? If there was not an advantage then everyone
would be using the 72"? Thoughts? JR
--- "Konrad L. Werner" <klwerner(at)comcast.net> wrote:

[quote] Good points, the ground clearance is 1" less on the
74", but I believe (don't hold me to it) the service
limit is 72" on these props, so if you ever would
damage the 72" with a need to cut it down a bit, you
are already there!!! The 74" has an inch on each
blade that you could work with. It should also have
a little bit more thrust (theoretically) then the
72". It is your choice, and do not archive

---


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
tylerii(at)infoave.net
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:17 am    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

Just a bit of marketing to us experimenters. Plus some of the RV8 Rocket
gollywhoppers.. gotta have more performance.. need more thrust.. more HP etc
guys want the biggest and best. So the manufacturers fill that niche. Same
reason Superior offers IO400 and LYCO offers IO390.....MORE POWER.....

At the end of the day you must ask...will the 180 HP engine with the 72 inch
CS prop carry a RV7A at 200 MPH true cruise at 8000 feet.....you bet it
will....and still get about 25 MPG
TangoBravo

--


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
dan(at)rvproject.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:33 am    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

The party line on this is...if you go with the longer blade, you have one
more inch on each tip that can be REMOVED in the event you need a repair.
Some would consider this cheap insurance since I believe the price is the
same.

Ok, so that's all well and good, but let's take a poll. How many people out
there have (or know somebody who has) had a prop strike where the prop was
salvageable with a simple 1" repair? Sound of crickets chirping... Maybe
I'm wrong, but the "advantage" of having that extra inch is questionable
imho.

Personally, I'd evaluate the difference between 72" and 74" props, otherwise
identical, on the basis of:

- ground clearance
- cruise performance
- climb performance

(the order may vary depending on your mission & landing gear)

Maybe you want to send an email to Les Doud or one of the other terrific
engineers over at Hartzell.

I have a 72" on my RV-7 taildragger. If I were buying a prop for my setup
today it would be the 72" BA Hartzell. Known good.

)_( Dan
RV-7 N714D (1253)
www.rvproject.com / www.weathermeister.com

---


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
rv7a.builder(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 10:09 am    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

I just talked to a service center guy at Hartzell and
he agreed that the longer the prop the more noise but
it may be negligible with this small difference. He
recommended the 74" but without much conviction. I
guess I should of talked to an engineer over there
instead of a service center guy? Anyway Dan, this is
John Robinson, have not talked with you in a couple of
years since I have been out of the flying business for
that long. I did order my engine and prop today(74").
My next bit of business is to get on a hangar waiting
list. JR
--- Dan Checkoway <dan(at)rvproject.com> wrote:

[quote]
<dan(at)rvproject.com>

The party line on this is...if you go with the
longer blade, you have one
more inch on each tip that can be REMOVED in the
event you need a repair.
Some would consider this cheap insurance since I
believe the price is the
same.

Ok, so that's all well and good, but let's take a
poll. How many people out
there have (or know somebody who has) had a prop
strike where the prop was
salvageable with a simple 1" repair? Sound of
crickets chirping... Maybe
I'm wrong, but the "advantage" of having that extra
inch is questionable
imho.

Personally, I'd evaluate the difference between 72"
and 74" props, otherwise
identical, on the basis of:

- ground clearance
- cruise performance
- climb performance

(the order may vary depending on your mission &
landing gear)

Maybe you want to send an email to Les Doud or one
of the other terrific
engineers over at Hartzell.

I have a 72" on my RV-7 taildragger. If I were
buying a prop for my setup
today it would be the 72" BA Hartzell. Known good.

)_( Dan
RV-7 N714D (1253)
www.rvproject.com / www.weathermeister.com

---


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
dpharker(at)worldnet.att.
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 2:56 pm    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

Hartzel told me the minimum usable is 72" so if you ding it your done.

I went with the 74"
Don Harker

RV-7A Finish Kit


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
rikvincent(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Apr 20, 2007 3:28 pm    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

It sounds to me that if you had a prop strike that only took 1" to repair, may not of hit the ground if it was 1" shorter.


--


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
gmcjetpilot



Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 170

PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 11:00 am    Post subject: 74 inch verse 72 inch Reply with quote

72" WILL give higher top speed, so if you like flying at full power and
RPM than this is the clear winner.

74" WILL give slightly better climb (low speed).

That is a fact. Now how much? A mph or two or three, a few dozen fpm.

Yes the service limit may be 72" but if WACK you prop, 72 or 74 it will
likely be damaged beyond repair.

Nose gear planes can easily strike prop, you are not immune; it takes
an uneven surface and/or gear deflection and/or botched landing, whack,
whack, whack.

My suggestion is for the average flyer get the 74". You can always cut it
down later if you want to race it at full RPM. Prop Dia makes a diff but a
small one. Since most don't run around at 2,600-2,700 RPM the larger
dia will be fine.



Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out [url=http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48245/*http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html;_ylc=X3oDMTE1YW1jcXJ2BF9TAzk3MTA3MDc2BHNlYwNtYWlsdGFncwRzbGsDbmV3LWNhcnM-]new cars at Yahoo! Autos.[/url] [quote][b]


- The Matronics RV7-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV7-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV7-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group