  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		PGLong
 
 
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 37
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 10:33 am    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Help.......I have an RV-4 and am experiencing landing problems with a rear  seater present. I installed a Landoll Harmonic Balancer and according to weight  and balance, should be able to tote a 225 pounder and stay within CG limits with  correct fuel loads. Even with a 120-150 pound person in the rear seat, the  elevator controls are so light it's almost like moving nothing. Not sure if I'm  over controlling, but it is so easy to get a hip hop dance down the runway.  Friend said to try and use a significant amount of down elevator trim to help.  Haven't tried that yet but will next flight. What works for others? Just stick  with wheel landings? Lots of friends that would like a ride, but hate to  threaten them while I learn new techniques.   
  Pat  Long
 PGLong(at)aol.com
 N120PL
 RV4
 Bay City, Michigan
 3CM
 
 Do  Not Archive
 
 
 See what's free at AOL.com. 
   [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Pat Long
 
RV-4, N120PL
 
Bay City, MI | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		dwaynecowles(at)yahoo.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 12:33 pm    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Pat,
 
 I have owned 2 rv's and my current one give me fits with aft cg.  I think wheel landings will help you a lot, land a little hot, fly it to the ground.  If you experience a lot of bounce (which I do) drop a wing just a little, let one wheel hit then the other.  Less likely to bounce.
 
 My 2 cents.
 
 Dwayne
 PGLong(at)aol.com wrote: 	  | Quote: | 	 		       Help.......I have an RV-4 and am experiencing landing problems with a rear  seater present. I installed a Landoll Harmonic Balancer and according to weight  and balance, should be able to tote a 225 pounder and stay within CG limits with  correct fuel loads. Even with a 120-150 pound person in  the rear seat, the  elevator controls are so light it's almost like moving nothing. Not sure if I'm  over controlling, but it is so easy to get a hip hop dance down the runway.  Friend said to try and use a significant amount of down elevator trim to help.  Haven't tried that yet but will next flight. What works for others? Just stick  with wheel landings? Lots of friends that would like a ride, but hate to  threaten them while I learn new techniques.   
  Pat  Long
 PGLong(at)aol.com
 N120PL
 RV4
 Bay City, Michigan
 3CM
 
 Do  Not Archive
 
 
 See what's free at [/b] | 	  [/quote]
 
    8:00? 8:25? 8:40? [url= http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/?fr=oni_on_mail&#news] Find a flick[/url] in no time
  with the[url= http://tools.search.yahoo.com/shortcuts/?fr=oni_on_mail&#news]Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.[/url] [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		esmith6(at)satx.rr.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 3:06 pm    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Pat................I've had my RV-4 for 14yrs, and  somewhere in mid yrs, I had the same problem you mentioned.
   
  Found out two things: 1. My pitot static system was  in error...If I indicated 60mph, I was actually doing 82.2mph...With a GIB (guy  in back) it still wanted to fly...I don't know why, but solo it never would do  the porpoise routine...Anyway I checked the pitot tube for bugs and etc...(used  air and blew from behind the inst. panel backwards, so they would come  out)...Then I put little stainless steel clamps on every connection in the  entire system.
  2. Fly often in that GIB configuration, get your  proficiency peaked...It worked for me...We don't fly  enough............CHEERS!!!!
   
   
                                                 
 Pat,
 I have owned 2 rv's and my current  one give me fits with aft cg.  I think wheel landings will help you a lot,  land a little hot, fly it to the ground.  If you experience a lot of bounce  (which I do) drop a wing just a little, let one wheel hit then the other.   Less likely to bounce.
 
 My 2 cents.
 
 Dwayne
 PGLong(at)aol.com (PGLong(at)aol.com) wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		      	  | Quote: | 	 		            Help.......I have an RV-4 and am experiencing landing problems with a      rear seater present. I installed a Landoll Harmonic Balancer and according      to weight and balance, should be able to tote a 225 pounder and stay within      CG limits with correct fuel loads. Even with a 120-150 pound person in the      rear seat, the elevator controls are so light it's almost like moving      nothing. Not sure if I'm over controlling, but it is so easy to get a hip      hop dance down the runway. Friend said to try and use a significant amount      of down elevator trim to help. Haven't tried that yet but will next flight.      What works for others? Just stick with wheel landings? Lots of friends that      would like a ride, but hate to threaten them while I learn new techniques.       
      Pat      Long
 PGLong(at)aol.com
 N120PL
 RV4
 Bay City,      Michigan
 3CM
 
 Do Not Archive
 
 
                See what's free at [/b]
  | 	  
    
       8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find    a flick in no time
 with theYahoo!    Search movie showtime shortcut.  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List
 href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
 
  | 	 
  | 	     [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		ceengland(at)bellsouth.ne Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 4:03 pm    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				PGLong(at)aol.com wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   Help.......I have an RV-4 and am experiencing landing problems with a 
  rear seater present. I installed a Landoll Harmonic Balancer and 
  according to weight and balance, should be able to tote a 225 pounder 
  and stay within CG limits with correct fuel loads. Even with a 120-150 
  pound person in the rear seat, the elevator controls are so light it's 
  almost like moving nothing. Not sure if I'm over controlling, but it is 
  so easy to get a hip hop dance down the runway. Friend said to try and 
  use a significant amount of down elevator trim to help. Haven't tried 
  that yet but will next flight. What works for others? Just stick with 
  wheel landings? Lots of friends that would like a ride, but hate to 
  threaten them while I learn new techniques.
   
  Pat Long
  PGLong(at)aol.com
  N120PL
  RV4
  Bay City, Michigan
  3CM
  
  Do Not Archive
  
 Hi Pat,
 | 	  
 
 I've owned 2 -4's, both with 160hp/wood prop, very light empty weight, & 
 the 1st had completely different characteristics from the one I'm flying 
 now. FWIW, 225 in the back seat is pushing the envelope in a -4. Yes, 
 I've done it (did it this afternoon for my biennial flight review) but 
 it really does change the airplane with that much weight in the back.
 
 I'm too lazy to type a long epistle, but email me your phone # or you 
 can call me at 601-879-9596 & I'll be glad to talk about why I think the 
 plane does what it does with a lot of weight in back. (Think flaps.)
 
 Charlie
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		baremetl(at)gvtc.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 5:03 pm    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Pat,
   
  I have the Landoll steel ring with a wood prop and light-weight  starter. I'm ok with 225lbs. in the rear as long as the baggage compartment is  empty. The stick forces are quite light, but manageable if I have my forearm  pressed against my thigh to brace my arm. I always 3-point, (or at least attempt  to), and occasionally skip a little, but all in all feel comfortable. Keep  practicing, it will come. And be sure to keep your speed low. Excess speed  makes it much more difficult. 
   
  Ivan Haecker     -4      1370  hrs.   S. Cen. TX
  [quote]   ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		daubuchon(at)volcano.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:10 pm    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Pat,
 I have about 500 hours on my 4, and this is what I have picked up over the years,,
 
 225lbs,, for MY airplane, is pretty much at the maximum I would have in the rear seat.
 My basic, "no-brainer" limit is 200lbs.  Anything over that, then I have to start some serious figuring.  That 200lb self-imposed limit assumes my usual load of stuff in the baggage area,, small tool kit, canopy cover, quart of oil,, etc.  Above 200lbs,,, everything in the baggage area comes out.
 Next is fuel.  
 As the fuel burns the aircraft cg slips aft, which exacerbates the situation.   So I will always start with full tanks and keep the legs short with a heavy load in the back
 As mentioned in your post, the forward trim trick is very important.  It gives the stick somewhat of a "preload," for lack of a better term and negates most of the effects of hardware slop in the control system.  As an added bonus, after time,,, you will be able to get a feel for the effectiveness of the trim, and adjust the airspeed over the fence accordingly.
 
 Just my two cents,,
 
 
  Derrick Aubuchon
 RV-4: N184DA
 Jackson/Westover -Amador County (O70)
 daubuchon(at)volcano.net (daubuchon(at)volcano.net)
  
 
 On Jul 5, 2007, at 11:25 AM, PGLong(at)aol.com (PGLong(at)aol.com) wrote:
 [quote]  Help.......I have an RV-4 and am experiencing landing problems with a rear seater present. I installed a Landoll Harmonic Balancer and according to weight and balance, should be able to tote a 225 pounder and stay within CG limits with correct fuel loads. Even with a 120-150 pound person in the rear seat, the elevator controls are so light it's almost like moving nothing. Not sure if I'm over controlling, but it is so easy to get a hip hop dance down the runway. Friend said to try and use a significant amount of down elevator trim to help. Haven't tried that yet but will next flight. What works for others? Just stick with wheel landings? Lots of friends that would like a ride, but hate to threaten them while I learn new techniques.  
  Pat Long
 PGLong(at)aol.com (PGLong(at)aol.com)
 N120PL
 RV4
 Bay City, Michigan
 3CM
 
 Do Not Archive
 
 
 See what's free at AOL.com. 
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List
 href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com
 
  | 	  [b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		James Baldwin
 
 
  Joined: 16 Jan 2006 Posts: 23
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 05, 2007 9:22 pm    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				James Baldwin wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   Pat -
  From a theoretical point of view I'll give you one answer: the real
 simple version.  I don't have my reference book in front of me but what
 | 	  
 we're obviously talking about here is called static longitudinal
 stability.  It has everything to do with what you are experiencing and
 is strictly a function of loading and the resultant location of the
 center of gravity (CG).  As the CG moves rearward it approaches the
 location of the lift line of the main wing.  The tail, for positive
 static stability, acts downward and  (I am ignoring some cases where
 unusual moments or other aerodynamic effects alter this case) is the
 variable controlled by the force at the control, or in the case of an
 RV, the stick.  Obviously as we all experience, the forces required by
 the horizontal tail vary with airspeed, thus the need for trim.   As the
 CG gets close to the lift line location longitudinally, due to passenger
 or baggage loading, the force required downward by the horizontal tail
 is less and less.  Since the downward force required is becoming smaller
 as we load more into the rear seat and baggage area it becomes more
 sensitive to small stick movements.  At the neutral point the tail does
 nothing but you'd better HANG ON!
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   That's a real simplistic description of what is going on here.  RV4s
 with lightweight starters, wood props,  no mags, etc already have a
 | 	  
 rearward bias to the location of the CG and thankfully the arm for these
 weight savings is pretty small.  I know of one RV6 in particular that
 has the opposite problem since he is using an IO360 angle valve with a
 CS prop.  He runs out of elevator in the flare!  He can't do a full
 stall landing.  
 What's the solution?  Well, put a CS prop on it.  Put an O360 up there.
  Is the battery located way up front?  Doing something like this is
 pretty radical so the other way to look at it is to actually measure the
 location of the CG and compare it to what Van dictates as practical
 limits.   I'm going to guess that you guys are exceeding the rearward
 limit that Van specifies as acceptable for decent handling.   I don't
 have the weight and balance information in front of me but if I remember
 I think the limits were something like 15 to 30% MAC (of the mean
 aerodynamic chord).  The way you find out where you are REALLY flying is
 to get three scales and fully load the airplane in a level attitude just
 the way the builder did when he finished building, only do it with a
 load the way you actually fly it.  You and your pax (or weights) sit in
 there and then you do the math after getting the weights from the
 scales.  Now you know what the problem is if my suspicions are correct:
 you are outside the weight and balance limits set by Van for your
 aircraft.  Van knew enough to put a margin in there for all of us but he
 also flew enough stuff to know he had to demand handling characteristics
 for the "least common denominator" pilot.  If I were you, I'd find out
 where my CG REALLY is and quit trying to defeat the physics of flight we
 all must deal with.   Out of the envelope operation can only lead to
 disaster when coupled with other factors such as wind, weather, low
 fuel, short runways, engine out, etc.  Using a forward trim does not
 change the effects of a poor loading scenario.  In fact it does not
 change the slope of the plot of the longitudinal stability (dcm/cg) line
 either, it just makes the controls feel better.
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   My guess is you'll discover you are operating your airplane outside
 the planned envelope and probably you need something more capable.  Go
 | 	  
 see John Harmon -- he has this thing called a Rocket.    JBB
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
  ps -- a big ps here:  I can imagine there maybe might be one or two
 cases out there where some error in building might bias the CG or wing
 | 	  
 location which would adversely affect the normal passenger load handling
 characteristic, but probably not, it's probably plain and simple weight
 and balance.
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
  PGLong(at)aol.com wrote:
 > Help.......I have an RV-4 and am experiencing landing problems with a
 rear seater present. I installed a Landoll Harmonic Balancer and
 | 	  
 according to weight and balance, should be able to tote a 225 pounder
 and stay within CG limits with correct fuel loads. Even with a 120-150
 pound person in the rear seat, the elevator controls are so light it's
 almost like moving nothing. Not sure if I'm over controlling, but it is
 so easy to get a hip hop dance down the runway. Friend said to try and
 use a significant amount of down elevator trim to help. Haven't tried
 that yet but will next flight. What works for others? Just stick with
 wheel landings? Lots of friends that would like a ride, but hate to
 threaten them while I learn new techniques.
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		smokyray(at)yahoo.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 2:58 am    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Jim,
    
   In simple tems I use a limit of 200lbs total aft of the roll bar in my 160HP wood prop RV4.Carrying heavier folks I add fuel which helps CG. A Landoll dampener, changing to an Odessey batter and mounting it on the firewall all helped.
    
    I personally only give rides to cute girls under 115 lbs...your call...
    
   Rob Ray
   15,000 gallons burned, RV4
 
 jamesbaldwin(at)dc.rr.com wrote:
   [quote]--> RV4-List message posted by: jamesbaldwin(at)dc.rr.com
 
 James Baldwin wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   Pat -
  From a theoretical point of view I'll give you one answer: the real
 simple version. I don't have my reference book in front of me but what
 | 	  
 we're obviously talking about here is called static longitudinal
 stability. It has everything to do with  what you are experiencing and
 is strictly a function of loading and the resultant location of the
 center of gravity (CG). As the CG moves rearward it approaches the
 location of the lift line of the main wing. The tail, for positive
 static stability, acts downward and (I am ignoring some cases where
 unusual moments or other aerodynamic effects alter this case) is the
 variable controlled by the force at the control, or in the case of an
 RV, the stick. Obviously as we all experience, the forces required by
 the horizontal tail vary with airspeed, thus the need for trim. As the
 CG gets close to the lift line location longitudinally, due to passenger
 or baggage loading, the force required downward by the horizontal tail
 is less and less. Since the downward force required is becoming smaller
 as we load more into the rear seat and baggage area it becomes more
 sensitive to small stick movements. At the neutral point the tail does
 nothing  but you'd better HANG ON!
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   That's a real simplistic description of what is going on here. RV4s
 with lightweight starters, wood props, no mags, etc already have a
 | 	  
 rearward bias to the location of the CG and thankfully the arm for these
 weight savings is pretty small. I know of one RV6 in particular that
 has the opposite problem since he is using an IO360 angle valve with a
 CS prop. He runs out of elevator in the flare! He can't do a full
 stall landing. 
 What's the solution? Well, put a CS prop on it. Put an O360 up there.
 Is the battery located way up front? Doing something like this is
 pretty radical so the other way to look at it is to actually measure the
 location of the CG and compare it to what Van dictates as practical
 limits. I'm going to guess that you guys are exceeding the rearward
 limit that Van specifies as acceptable for decent handling. I don't
 have the weight and balance information in front of me but if I  remember
 I think the limits were something like 15 to 30% MAC (of the mean
 aerodynamic chord). The way you find out where you are REALLY flying is
 to get three scales and fully load the airplane in a level attitude just
 the way the builder did when he finished building, only do it with a
 load the way you actually fly it. You and your pax (or weights) sit in
 there and then you do the math after getting the weights from the
 scales. Now you know what the problem is if my suspicions are correct:
 you are outside the weight and balance limits set by Van for your
 aircraft. Van knew enough to put a margin in there for all of us but he
 also flew enough stuff to know he had to demand handling characteristics
 for the "least common denominator" pilot. If I were you, I'd find out
 where my CG REALLY is and quit trying to defeat the physics of flight we
 all must deal with. Out of the envelope operation can only lead to
 disaster when coupled with  other factors such as wind, weather, low
 fuel, short runways, engine out, etc. Using a forward trim does not
 change the effects of a poor loading scenario. In fact it does not
 change the slope of the plot of the longitudinal stability (dcm/cg) line
 either, it just makes the controls feel better.
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   My guess is you'll discover you are operating your airplane outside
 the planned envelope and probably you need something more capable. Go
 | 	  
 see John Harmon -- he has this thing called a Rocket. JBB
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
  ps -- a big ps here: I can imagine there maybe might be one or two
 cases out there where some error in building might bias the CG or wing
 | 	  
 location which would adversely affect the normal passenger load handling
 characteristic, but probably not, it's probably plain and simple weight
 and balance.
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
  PGLong(at)aol.com wrote:
 > Help.......I have an RV-4 and am experiencing landing problems with a
 rear seater    Looking for earth-friendly autos? 
 | 	  
  Browse Top Cars by "Green Rating" at Yahoo! Autos' Green Center.   [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		splitess(at)suscom-maine. Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jul 06, 2007 3:38 am    Post subject: Landing a loaded RV-4 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Pat,
  What is your empty weight for your RV4? Mine is 995, which  is about 80 lbs heavier than the planned target of 905-913.  With that in  mind and running my own W&B numbers I never even considered anyone over 150  pounds for the rear pax with full fuel and an empty rea comparment. I only  have about 25 hours in mine, so some insight would be valuable. I have  an 320H2D up front with fixed pitch prop, so I am pretty much standard with a  standard VFR panel.   
   
  Steve
  D. Steven Schlieper
 8 Homeplace
 Topsham, Maine 04086
   
  Tony Blair's comment...
 In case we find ourselves starting to believe  all the anti-American sentiment
 and negativity; we should remember England's  Prime Minister Tony Blair's words during a
 recent interview. When asked by  one of his Parliament members why he believes so much in 
 America, he said:  "A simple way to take measure of a country, is to look at how many want in...  
 and how many want out. Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for  you:
   
  1. Jesus Christ
 2. The American G. I.
   
  One died for your soul, the other for your freedom."
   
   
  [quote]   ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |