  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		bhancock(at)worldwidewarb Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:38 am    Post subject: Prop Strikes and tear downs | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				On Jul 12, 2007, at 11:58 PM, Yak-List Digest Server wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
  I heard Carl   
 Hays say that if these engines had a prop strike like this - no need   
 to worry about the engine and DO NOT tear down to inspect.  Would   
 everyone agree?  | 	  
 
 The bag of worms is opened!     
 
 Carl Hays has a lot of experience with these engines and I respect his opinion.  The other side of this is there is AT LEAST 3 known engine failures after prop strikes.   Yes, wood and composite is softer than metal, but just how soft is a baseball bat swung at full speed, or water at 70 mph, or air at 200 mph?  Point here is just because wood core props are "softer" doesn't mean that they are not strong enough to cause internal damage during a sudden stoppage.  
 
 Here is a related example.  We now have a customer with a Lancair IV-P that had a history two nose gear collapses.  After the first one they tore the engine apart only to find that everything was A-OK.....a "waste of money" right?  Well....we get called in on the job after the second prop strike and the owner tells me "we tore it down after the first one and there was nothing wrong....I was at idle, so I'm sure it's OK...just throw another prop on it and I'll go fly it."  Well, he doesn't have a wife or kids, but I still insisted that we at least do a run out on the crank.  Sure enough, it didn't meet spec.  We sent the engine to Firewall Forward (who turned the engine in 5 working days) and both the crank and case were bad.  Had he "just put another prop on it" and went flying, his engine definitely would have failed....  (As an aside, the plane was being used in an upcoming movie called FAST GLASS....we flew in it and maintained all 8 of the airplanes...it was a kick!) 
 
 Incidentally, the nose gear collapses were a result of improper hardware and improper installation by previous "mechanics" ...a story unto itself.
 
 I will never figure out why so many of us pilots put out pocket books before our lives.  If there was even a 1 in 100 chance that you were going to have an engine failure, what do you think your significant other or your kids would tell you to do?
 
 See you at OSH,
 
 Barry
 
  [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Ernie
 
 
  Joined: 11 Jan 2006 Posts: 513
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:04 am    Post subject: Re: Prop Strikes and tear downs | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I'm not sure what kind of engine the Lancair has, but many Continental engines have Nitrited cranks which are stong but as brittle as glass, so yes I would always tear down any flat engine after a prop strike. My old J-58 Bonanza prop suffered a collision with a towbar which was still attached (Dont ask) and when I tore the engine down the crank was cracked.
 
 That said, the overhaul manual for the Husai engine says in so many words.
 
 "If the prop strike wasnt a "Sudden Stoppage", and the damage is located more than 3 feet (more or less, I dont remember the exact dimension), from the center axis of the4 hub (about 6 inches in from the wing tip)  then just replace the prop. I've heard of people doing "Run Out" checks on our round engines. This proves nothing. If the engine was idleing, and you landed on grass or sand, and the prop kept turning, and the blades showed no signs of gross impact (missing metal etc) and the bend occurs beyond the manual specs, then you are probably ok to just replace the prop. Otherwise a teardown is warranted.
 
 Ernie
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		rvfltd(at)televar.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:01 am    Post subject: Prop Strikes and tear downs | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Guys,
 Would you put your wife or children in a aircraft that was "probably" 
 OK?  For that matter would you fly it your self?  Next time you take a 
 buddy flying tell him/her that "ya it had a prop strike, but it's 
 probably OK", and watch the reaction.  If they are smart they will run 
 like hell.   After owning one of the major aircraft salvage companies in 
 the US for nearly 20 years (Aircraft Salvage and Rebuild Inc) and 
 salvaging over 1000 aircraft, I think I have seen nearly every type of 
 accident, from hand propping to wind damage, from bad external loads to 
 cruising full tilt into a cloud full of mountain.  I have seen prop 
 flanges break off,  mag gear shafts break, gears loose teeth, lock pins 
 and keepers come loose, cylinders come completely off the engine.  I 
 have seen "homemade mods" come loose causing all sorts of havoc, exhaust 
 with holes which caused engine fires, the list is long but in most 
 instances can be traced back to something we could have prevented if we 
 had not put our wallets in front of our good judgment. 
 
 Recently as most of you know I had a engine failure where in all three 
 of the planetary gears in the nose case failed and all power was lost.  
 This accident was felt by all who inspected the engine to be the result 
 of a prop strike somewhere in the aircrafts distance past.   True the 
 engine installed on this aircraft came from China "used" but it is no 
 different than me buying a stateside aircraft that had had a 
 undocumented prop strike in it's past.  If you sell your aircraft what 
 is your obligation to the guy who buys it?  Did you note the prop strike 
 in the logs so he can make an informed decision?  Most owners hesitate 
 to do so because they feel that it lessens the resale value of the 
 aircraft, but that's a topic for future posts.   Guy's, we have enough 
 problems to worry about without having to worry about rather the engine 
 has been damaged internally after a prop strike, so believe me when I 
 say that you simply rolling the dice, maybe you will and maybe you 
 won't, maybe it will run 5 hours maybe it will run 500 hours.   If you 
 have had a prop strike I do not believe that you can honestly look me in 
 the eye and tell me that you feel good enough about your engine to load 
 your love ones up and go flying.  It always amazes me that when we ARE 
 fully insured the prop strikes are always worse than when we ARE NOT 
 insured.  Yes, some have gotten away with doing nothing but changing the 
 prop but folks, it simply is NOT worth the chance, and money in this 
 instance should not be part of the equation, if it is maybe you should 
 look again at rather or not you can afford to own this type of 
 aircraft.  If you cannot afford to install a fresh engine at the minimum 
 send the prop struck engine out for tear down and inspection.  Then put 
 the engine on a 5 to 10 hour oil change with oil analysis at each 
 change, and watch it like your life depends on it, because it just 
 might.   
 
 Always Yakin,
 Doug
 
 Ernie wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 I'm not sure what kind of engine the Lancair has, but many Continental engines have Nitrited cranks which are stong but as brittle as glass, so yes I would always tear down any flat engine after a prop strike. My old J-58 Bonanza prop suffered a collision with a towbar which was still attached (Dont ask) and when I tore the engine down the crank was cracked.
 
 That said, the overhaul manual for the Husai engine says in so many words.
 
 "If the prop strike wasnt a "Sudden Stoppage", and the damage is located more than 3 feet (more or less, I dont remember the exact dimension), from the center axis of the4 hub (about 6 inches in from the wing tip)  then just replace the prop. I've heard of people doing "Run Out" checks on our round engines. This proves nothing. If the engine was idleing, and you landed on grass or sand, and the prop kept turning, and the blades showed no signs of gross impact (missing metal etc) and the bend occurs beyond the manual specs, then you are probably ok to just replace the prop. Otherwise a teardown is warranted.
 
 Ernie
 
 
 Read this topic online here:
 
 http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=124349#124349
 
 
 
   
 
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		f4ffm2(at)adelphia.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 11:56 am    Post subject: Prop Strikes and tear downs | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Doug is, as always, a voice of reason and experience...saying things  
 to which we should pay attention.
 
 I recently happened to be looking directly at a CJ when the pilot had  
 a "brain fart" and raised the gear lever.  He didn't raise the gear,  
 but he certainly lowered the airplane.  To the point; the airplane  
 was parked and the engine was at idle....but when the one blade  
 struck the ground, the convulsion that the rest of the airplane went  
 through gave graphic evidence of the enormous forces that are working  
 inside the engine...even at idle.
 
 Thanks Doug.
 
 Roger_____________________________________________________________
 On Jul 17, 2007, at 11:57 AM, Doug Sapp wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   
 
  Guys,
  Would you put your wife or children in a aircraft that was  
  "probably" OK?  For that matter would you fly it your self?  Next  
  time you take a buddy flying tell him/her that "ya it had a prop  
  strike, but it's probably OK", and watch the reaction.  If they are  
  smart they will run like hell.   After owning one of the major  
  aircraft salvage companies in the US for nearly 20 years (Aircraft  
  Salvage and Rebuild Inc) and salvaging over 1000 aircraft, I think  
  I have seen nearly every type of accident, from hand propping to  
  wind damage, from bad external loads to cruising full tilt into a  
  cloud full of mountain.  I have seen prop flanges break off,  mag  
  gear shafts break, gears loose teeth, lock pins and keepers come  
  loose, cylinders come completely off the engine.  I have seen  
  "homemade mods" come loose causing all sorts of havoc, exhaust with  
  holes which caused engine fires, the list is long but in most  
  instances can be traced back to something we could have prevented  
  if we had not put our wallets in front of our good judgment.
  Recently as most of you know I had a engine failure where in all  
  three of the planetary gears in the nose case failed and all power  
  was lost.  This accident was felt by all who inspected the engine  
  to be the result of a prop strike somewhere in the aircrafts  
  distance past.   True the engine installed on this aircraft came  
  from China "used" but it is no different than me buying a stateside  
  aircraft that had had a undocumented prop strike in it's past.  If  
  you sell your aircraft what is your obligation to the guy who buys  
  it?  Did you note the prop strike in the logs so he can make an  
  informed decision?  Most owners hesitate to do so because they feel  
  that it lessens the resale value of the aircraft, but that's a  
  topic for future posts.   Guy's, we have enough problems to worry  
  about without having to worry about rather the engine has been  
  damaged internally after a prop strike, so believe me when I say  
  that you simply rolling the dice, maybe you will and maybe you  
  won't, maybe it will run 5 hours maybe it will run 500 hours.   If  
  you have had a prop strike I do not believe that you can honestly  
  look me in the eye and tell me that you feel good enough about your  
  engine to load your love ones up and go flying.  It always amazes  
  me that when we ARE fully insured the prop strikes are always worse  
  than when we ARE NOT insured.  Yes, some have gotten away with  
  doing nothing but changing the prop but folks, it simply is NOT  
  worth the chance, and money in this instance should not be part of  
  the equation, if it is maybe you should look again at rather or not  
  you can afford to own this type of aircraft.  If you cannot afford  
  to install a fresh engine at the minimum send the prop struck  
  engine out for tear down and inspection.  Then put the engine on a  
  5 to 10 hour oil change with oil analysis at each change, and watch  
  it like your life depends on it, because it just might.
  Always Yakin,
  Doug
 
  Ernie wrote:
 
 > 
 >
 > I'm not sure what kind of engine the Lancair has, but many  
 > Continental engines have Nitrited cranks which are stong but as  
 > brittle as glass, so yes I would always tear down any flat engine  
 > after a prop strike. My old J-58 Bonanza prop suffered a collision  
 > with a towbar which was still attached (Dont ask) and when I tore  
 > the engine down the crank was cracked.
 >
 > That said, the overhaul manual for the Husai engine says in so  
 > many words.
 >
 > "If the prop strike wasnt a "Sudden Stoppage", and the damage is  
 > located more than 3 feet (more or less, I dont remember the exact  
 > dimension), from the center axis of the4 hub (about 6 inches in  
 > from the wing tip)  then just replace the prop. I've heard of  
 > people doing "Run Out" checks on our round engines. This proves  
 > nothing. If the engine was idleing, and you landed on grass or  
 > sand, and the prop kept turning, and the blades showed no signs of  
 > gross impact (missing metal etc) and the bend occurs beyond the  
 > manual specs, then you are probably ok to just replace the prop.  
 > Otherwise a teardown is warranted.
 >
 > Ernie
 >
 >
 > Read this topic online here:
 >
 > http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=124349#124349
 >
 >
 
 
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Michael Bolton
 
 
  Joined: 31 May 2007 Posts: 9
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 6:06 am    Post subject: Prop Strikes and tear downs | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Wow Roger, I thought I was the only one with a brain like that.  I also have 
 a Housai engine sitting in the corner of the hangar, anyone intrested? lol
 Thanks for all of your help Doug
 
 Michael
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |