Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

LSE Direct crank vs. Hall effect

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV4-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
baremetl(at)gvtc.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 5:41 pm    Post subject: LSE Direct crank vs. Hall effect Reply with quote

After nearly 1400 hrs.and 4 mag failures (Slick), I am considering an LSE unit to replace the right mag. I realize that the direct crank sensor is less expensive and that the Hall effect sensor that mounts in the old mag position is simpler to install. Ignoring the cost difference and initial installation difference, is there any other reason to pick one over the other? I am looking for comments on reliability of one sensor vs. the other and any other pertinent information.

Thanks,

Ivan Haecker -4 1381 hrs. S. Cen. TX

ps 3 failed coils and 1 failed condensor. And yes I used blast tubes (after the 1st failure!)
[quote][b]


- The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List
Back to top
smokyray(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:36 pm    Post subject: LSE Direct crank vs. Hall effect Reply with quote

1500 hours on my Electroair ignition...give them a call.

www.electroair.net

Rob Ray

"H.Ivan Haecker" <baremetl(at)gvtc.com> wrote:[quote] After nearly 1400 hrs.and 4 mag failures (Slick), I am considering an LSE unit to replace the right mag. I realize that the direct crank sensor is less expensive and that the Hall effect sensor that mounts in the old mag position is simpler to install. Ignoring the cost difference and initial installation difference, is there any other reason to pick one over the other? I am looking for comments on reliability of one sensor vs. the other and any other pertinent information.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics RV4-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV4-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV4-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group