  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		John Jung
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Surprise, AZ, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 4:54 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Group,
 
 This afternoon, I just took my first flight with 102 LandShorter VG's on my Firestar II. It sure is different! It used to stall with a somewhat clean break at 38 to 40 mph. I had it down to 30 mph with no actual break. It was sinking at 500 ft/min at 30 mph and it sort of rocked from side to side, but the nose never dropped. It was a thermally afternoon, so I will get better information on future flights. The one landing was a little surprising. I sort of expected it to float down the runway, but it settled gently at 38 mph.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Jung
 
Firestar II N6163J
 
Surprise, AZ | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Possum
 
 
  Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 112 Location: Georgia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 4:43 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				So where did you stick the VGs on the wings?
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 Group,
 
 This afternoon, I just took my first flight with 102 LandShorter 
 VG's on my Firestar II. It sure is different! It used to stall with 
 a somewhat clean break at 38 to 40 mph. I had it down to 30 mph with 
 no actual break. It was sinking at 500 ft/min at 30 mph and it sort 
 of rocked from side to side, but the nose never dropped. It was a 
 thermally afternoon, so I will get better information on future 
 flights. The one landing was a little surprising. I sort of expected 
 it to float down the runway, but it settled gently at 38 mph.
 
 --------
 John Jung
 Firestar II N6163J
 Surprise, AZ
 
 
 Read this topic online here:
 
 http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=21607#21607
 
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:27 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 04:54 PM 3/13/06 -0800, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 Group,
 
 This afternoon, I just took my first flight with 102 LandShorter VG's on my Firestar II. It sure is different! It used to stall with a somewhat clean break at 38 to 40 mph. I had it down to 30 mph with no actual break. It was sinking at 500 ft/min at 30 mph and it sort of rocked from side to side, but the nose never dropped. It was a thermally afternoon, so I will get better information on future flights. The one landing was a little surprising. I sort of expected it to float down the runway, but it settled gently at 38 mph.
 
 --------
 John Jung
 Firestar II N6163J
 Surprise, AZ
 
 
 | 	  
 John,
 
 I believe we have another believer in the making.  
 
 Jack B. Hart FF004
 Winchester, IN
 
 do not archive
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Jung
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Surprise, AZ, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 5:35 pm    Post subject: Re: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Possum wrote: | 	 		  | So where did you stick the VGs on the wings? | 	  
 
 I placed them 2.75 inches apart and 8 inches back from the leading edge.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Jung
 
Firestar II N6163J
 
Surprise, AZ | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		wcm(at)tampabay.rr.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 6:36 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				John,
 How did you arrive at the distance aft of the leading edge?
 
 Chris Mallory
 
 do not archive
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Jung
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Surprise, AZ, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 8:19 pm    Post subject: Re: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | wcm(at)tampabay.rr.com wrote: | 	 		  John,
 How did you arrive at the distance aft of the leading edge?
 
 Chris Mallory
 
 do not archive
 --- | 	  
 
 The distance is a compromise. Not as far forward as LandShorter recommends, and not as far back as the flashing type that are common  on Kolbs. I'll get some good data after I fly in smooth air, but for now it looks promising.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Jung
 
Firestar II N6163J
 
Surprise, AZ | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Possum
 
 
  Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 112 Location: Georgia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Mar 16, 2006 6:00 am    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 07:54 PM 3/13/2006, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 Group,
 
 This afternoon, I just took my first flight with 102 LandShorter 
 VG's on my Firestar II. It sure is different! It used to stall with 
 a somewhat clean break at 38 to 40 mph. I had it down to 30 mph with 
 no actual break.
 
 | 	  
 Try easing the stick back at full throttle and see if it feels like 
 your pointing up at almost a 40 degree angle before it stalls or 
 "mushes". Then try a "high bank" circle at 30 or 32 mph. That's what 
 impressed me the most about the addition of the VGs.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Jung
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Surprise, AZ, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:18 pm    Post subject: VG's on Firestar II, The Rest of the Story! | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Group,
 
 This morning, I got a chance to fly in calm air, and really test the LandShorter VG's on my Firestar II. Wow! Call me a believer. This was the most sigificant change that I have made to my Firestar by a long shot. I was one that found the VG reports by others a little hard to believe. I thought that they had to be exagerating some. No more. 
 
 My Firestar II now has a 10 mph lower stall speed. That's 40 mph indicateed down to 30 mph indicated. But that is only for starters: The stall, before, was sharp enough to bend the aluminum gear by flairing too soon and stalling just 10 feet over the runway. Now the stall is almost none existant. The break can be felt, it's eazy to notice, but the nose hardly drops and the wing starts flying again with no input from me. I did full power stalls, cruise power stalls, and power at idle stalls. All were at 30 mph and with similar results. 
 
 Possum said to take steep turns at 30 mph. I'm not ready to try that, but I did try steep turns at 40 mph. Amazing! My Firestar did a good imitation of a glider. It held altitude in a steep turn with only about 100 rpm more than it took to hold altitude on the level. 
 
 And that brings up the next change: I needed about 400 rpm less to hold altitude then before. Used to be 4,900, now 4,500. I know that density altitude can change this so the results are not final. They are promising.
 
 So, you ask "What is lost to gain these things? It can't be all good, can it?" I did a top speed run to see if it is still in the ball park. Best guess from today is a a 3 mph loss. As far as rpms to hold cruise speed, it appeared to be too close to call. I am more concerned about how much gas I will burn per hour at a given speed. If it goes up, that will be a loss that I care about, but I will need a few trips to evaluate that.
 
 Can I really land slower? I think only a little. In order to get the speed down below 40, the tail must be lower. If I try to do that over the runway, the tail just touches and the mains come down. I do believe that it will be easier to get into a small strip, because I will be able to fly the approach 10 mph slower.
 
 Now that I have a new 10 mph range to fly, where is the wing most efficient? What speed is the sink the least? I tried this at 4,500 rpms and idle. The results were the same. No change from 40 to 30. I could hold altitude at 4,500 rpms at any speed between 30 and 40, no climb and no sink. If I went faster than 40, I needed more rpms. At idle, I had a 500 to 600 ft/min sink anywhere between 30 and 40 mph.
 
 Here is my recomendation: If you haven't flown a Kolb yet, put VGs on before the first flight. If you are already flying a Kolb without VG's, try them, you will like them.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Jung
 
Firestar II N6163J
 
Surprise, AZ | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		agustafson(at)chartermi.n Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:06 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				My FSII flies that good right out of the box! It's for sale, by the way. 95, 
 431 hrs.,8G w/ enc. trailer. Upper Michigan. Contact me direct and put "Kolb 
 for sale" in the subject line or I won't get it.
 
 Aaron     agustafson(at)chartermi.net   do not archive
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  >> That's 40 mph indicateed down to 30 mph indicated. <<< 
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		wcm(at)tampabay.rr.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:45 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				John, 
 
 Did you  install the VG's on your horizontal stabilizer also?
 
 Chris Mallory
 
 do not archive
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		wcm(at)tampabay.rr.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 1:59 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				John,
 
 Did you  install the VG's on your horizontal stabilizer also?
 
 Chris Mallory
 
 do not archive
 
 ---
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Jung
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Surprise, AZ, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 4:27 pm    Post subject: Re: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | wcm(at)tampabay.rr.com wrote: | 	 		  John,
 
 Did you  install the VG's on your horizontal stabilizer also?
 
 Chris Mallory
 
 do not archive
 
 --- | 	  
 
 No, just on the wings. My Firestar has a 37% CG, so I had no problem with enough up elevator.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Jung
 
Firestar II N6163J
 
Surprise, AZ | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Hauck
 
  
  Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 5:41 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi John J/All:
 
 "But that is only for starters: The stall, before, was sharp enough to 
 bend the aluminum gear by flairing too soon and stalling just 10 feet 
 over the runway."
 
 I might be reading this wrong, but you can straighten me out if I am. 
 I don't know of any Kolb that won't spread the gear as the result of a 
 10 ft drop.
 
 "Now the stall is almost none existant. The break can be felt, it's 
 eazy to notice, but the nose hardly drops and the wing starts flying 
 again with no input from me. I did full power stalls, cruise power 
 stalls, and power at idle stalls. All were at 30 mph and with similar 
 results."
 
 How did the above change your landing technique?
 
 Interesting to note, FSII stalled at 30 mph full power, cruise power, 
 and power off.
 
 | Possum said to take steep turns at 30 mph. I'm not ready to try 
 that, but I did try steep turns at 40 mph. Amazing! My Firestar did a 
 good imitation of a glider. It held altitude in a steep turn with only 
 about 100 rpm more than it took to hold altitude on the level.
 
 Correct me if I am wrong.  If you stall at 30 mph straight and level, 
 your stall speed will increase quite a bit in a tight turn, or do the 
 VG's take care of that little problem?
 
  | --------
 | John Jung
 JJ, glad you are happy with the VG's.  Keep us informed as you gain 
 more experience with them.  Still contemplating sticking those little 
 things all over my wings.  First, I have to get back in the MKIII and 
 get some flying done to get my flying skills up a bit.  For the most 
 part, most Kolbs I have flown without VG's perform as described by 
 those of you that are now flying them, with the major exception of 
 shaving 10 mph off the indicated stall speed.
 
 Lot's to be learned about these little critters, VG's and Kolbs.
 
 john h
 MKIII
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Hauck
 
MKIII/912ULS
 
hauck's holler
 
Titus, Alabama | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Jung
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 108 Location: Surprise, AZ, USA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 4:44 am    Post subject: Re: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | John Hauck wrote: | 	 		  Hi John J/All:
 
 For the most 
 part, most Kolbs I have flown without VG's perform as described by 
 those of you that are now flying them, with the major exception of 
 shaving 10 mph off the indicated stall speed.
 
 Lot's to be learned about these little critters, VG's and Kolbs.
 
 john h
 MKIII | 	  
 
 John H and Group,
 
 That is what I thought, too. It is hard to imagine that such great planes could be this much better. It is somewhat like the upgrade to the DRE 6000. It is one thing to read a description the difference and quite another to experience it.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Jung
 
Firestar II N6163J
 
Surprise, AZ | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Thom Riddle
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1597 Location: Buffalo, NY, USA (9G0)
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:06 am    Post subject: Re: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				John,
 
 I made my own VGs for the early Firestar I once had but put them back about 11" from the leading edge. I think you said yours are at about 8" back. My stall speed was definitely reduced buy not quite as much as yours, which makes sense since the high AOA at stall apparently puts your VGs prettly close to the "burble" point whereas mine were a bit aft of that point and thus less effective.
 
 Mine however had different effects to the stall characteristics. Without VGs the Firestar's stall was very gentle with mild break. With the VGs the break was quick and quite abrupt. My cruise power speeds were unaffected by the VGs, probably because at cruise AOA the VGs were aft of the highest point of the airfoil, whereas yours are at a relatively high pressure point forward of the airfoil peak.
 
 As you noted, the landing speed is unaffected because of the three point stance has an AOA well below the stall AOA. This lack of slowing the touchdown speed (landings not shorter) and the sharper break were the determinining factors for me deciding to remove them. I knew beforehand that a slower stall speed would not reduce the landing speed in any Kolb with short main gear legs but just wanted to experiment with them and am glad I did. It was fun and proved that VGs do indeed reduce stall speed. 
 
 MY persoanal conclusions:
 1. VGs will reduce the stall speed of a Kolb.
 2. VGs may of may not changed the stall characteristics, depending upon where they are installed.
 3. VGs may or may not change power required for a given cruise speed, depending upon where they are installed.
 4. Kolbs with long gear legs might actually get a slower touchdown speed and thus shorter landing roll with properly installed VGs.
 5. Wether you make your own or buy store bought ones, makes little difference, since all they do is twirl the air to where turbulence begins at high AOA without VGs.
 
 Question about your lower approach speed:
 Normal approach speed on final is (according to most authorities) 1.3 x Vs. If you were stalling at 40 IAS was your final speed about 52 IAS before and now 39 mph (1.3x30)? If so then to land three point I guess you have to speed up 1 mph to land  .
 
 Thom in Buffalo
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Possum
 
 
  Joined: 12 Jan 2006 Posts: 112 Location: Georgia
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:08 am    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 03:18 PM 3/17/2006, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 Possum said to take steep turns at 30 mph. I'm not ready to try 
 that, but I did try steep turns at 40 mph. Amazing! My Firestar did 
 a good imitation of a glider.
 
 | 	  
 
 I don't think anything bad will happen.
 Even when I stall the plane in one of these turns - the high wing
 stalls first and it just drops back to level.
 I know that is not what supposed to happen.
 It might have done that even before the VGs.
 
 But........ it is certainly easier to heard geese and follow buzzards
 when you don't have to run over them or do S-turns.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		John Hauck
 
  
  Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 7:50 am    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				| 4. Kolbs with long gear legs might actually get a slower touchdown 
 speed and thus shorter landing roll with properly installed VGs.
  |
 | Thom in Buffalo
 Thom/Gang:
 
 I have never flown with VG's on a Kolb or any other aircraft, that I 
 know of.  So.....I can only speak from experience without them. 
 However, many of the attributes claimed after addition of VG's were 
 there, in our Kolbs, prior to VG installation.
 
 1.  Most every Kolb will climb at full power with the stick pulled all 
 the way back to the stop.  Angle of attack is extremely high.
 
 2.  Extremely tight turns at extremely high bank angles, left and 
 right.
 
 3.  Very gentle stall characteristics.
 
 4.  Fully controllable mush/stall.  Permits altitude lose quickly, 
 while maintaining reduced airspeeds.
 
 5.  Equipped with sufficiently tall main landing gear legs, all Kolb 
 models perform excellent 3 point landings naturally, with or without 
 full flaps.  Touch down speeds, at the break, in ground effect, are 
 somewhat lower than Kolbs with standard gear legs.
 
 All of the above, with the exception of paragraph 5, can be performed 
 with any standard Kolb model.  The mere thought of the additional 
 capability of my airplane with a good set of VG's, properly installed, 
 is frightening............    
 
 john h
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ John Hauck
 
MKIII/912ULS
 
hauck's holler
 
Titus, Alabama | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:16 pm    Post subject: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 07:06 AM 3/18/06 -0800, you wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 
 4. Kolbs with long gear legs might actually get a slower touchdown speed 
 and thus shorter landing roll with properly installed VGs.
 | 	  
 
 Thom,
 
 The same is true for standard leg Kolbs.  VG's increase wing lift for any 
 speed above stall.  Because of this, any Kolb with VGs can fly a little 
 slower and generate the same lift as it did at a higher speed before the 
 addition of VGs.
 
 For a FireFly, it is not necessary to increase leg length to enable slower 
 touch down speeds.  All one has to do is droop the flaperons a few degrees 
 and it will three point nicely. 
 
 Jack B. Hart FF004
 Winchester, IN
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Thom Riddle
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1597 Location: Buffalo, NY, USA (9G0)
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sat Mar 18, 2006 2:48 pm    Post subject: Re: Land Shorter VG's on Firestar II | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Jack,
 
 If the aircraft has flaps or flaperons (my old Firestar had neither) then the nose down pitch resulting from their use certainly would allow slower landing speeds at the same angle of attack as without the VGs. This assumes that the VGs do actually increase lift at this AOA, not merely increase the critical AOA. In my mental analysis of the situation, I can see this happening only if the point on the airfoil where the turbulence starts is changed (moved aft) at this AOA by the VGs presence, thus subjecting more of the upper camber to smooth, non-turbulent flow which could then produce more effective lift at the same AOA.
 
 I would guess that the only easy/simple way to determine if this is the case for a particular installation, is to carefully document airspeeds, power (rpm) settings, and airspeeds in smooth air. A change in any of these (outside known measurement accuracy) would indicate a change in lift per the equation: Lift = 1/2 rho x V^2 x S(wing area). 
 
 The AOA at low speeds (approaching stall) varies quite rapidly with speed changes but at cruise speeds the AOA changes very little with changes in speed. Therefore the most likely speed range to detect this change in lift due to VGs would be at very slow speeds. Perhaps you or others have done this to confirm a change in lift due to VGs holding all else fixed. I did not bother to do this sort of documentation because the only location I tried the VGs on resulted in a rather unsavory abrupt break at stall. Apparently locating them somewhat more forward would have made a difference in this regard but it would also have increased drag at cruise and that was not a result I wanted.
 
 Thinking back now, I believe I noticed (didn't document) a slightly lower liftoff speed in three point with the VGs than without. That sounds like confirmation of increased lift right there because of necessity, the angle of attack is fixed. 
 
 Sorry for the "thinking out loud" long winded discussion but I think I am now convinced that they do increase lift at standard Kolb 3-point AOA.
 Thom in Buffalo
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Earl Zimmerman
 
  
  Joined: 13 Jan 2006 Posts: 35 Location: Elizabethtown, PA
  | 
		 | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |