nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:40 am    Post subject: Z-12 questions (corrections) | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 08:38 AM 8/27/2010, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  At 11:52 PM 8/26/2010, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		   Bob,
   
  I know you’re a very busy man, so I hope I’m not imposing too much by asking you a couple of questions. I’m hoping you can help shed some light on these issues, for which I’ve been unable to find answers: | 	  
    No problem, it's what we do.
   	  | Quote: | 	 		    
  1. My RV-8 will utilize a Z-12-based architecture, including a 60A main alternator, and a 20A backup alternator from B&C mounted on the vacuum pad. I am using the standard LR-3 and SB-1 alternator controllers. My first question is: Does the “Aux Alternator” switch normally stay ON during flight, so that the Aux alternator actually provides power to the Main Bus all the time? Or should the switch stay OFF, only to be switched on by the pilot in the event of a Main alternator failure? | 	  
    The SB-1 REGULATOR is specifically designed for STANDBY service
    and is normally installed with a setpoint down around 13.5 volts.
    Therefore, the second alternator installed for standby service | 	     USING THE SB-1 is not intended to either share loads with the main
     alternator nor is it intended to charge the ship's battery.
 
   	  | Quote: | 	 		    It's your option, you can leave it ON or OFF at all times for normal
    flight . . . if left ON, the SB-1 regulator will interpret the
    normal bus voltage of 14+ volts as "too high" and will completely
    relax thus driving the SB alternator field voltage to zero.
 
    In the event of main alternator shut down for any reason, the
    bus voltage would normally fall to battery support levels
    that start at about 12.5 volts and goes down from there.
    If the SB alternator is ON, this depression in bus votlage
    will cause the SB-1 regulator to wake up and bring the
    standby alternator into service. It will annunciate the fact
    by illuminating the SB ALT loaded light. If total loads on
    the SB alternator exceed 20A, the SB-1 will flash the warning
    light . . . the pilot is advised to reduce ship's electrical
    loads until flashing stops.
 
    If left OFF, you'll get a LO VOLTS warning light that
    prompts you to turn the sb alternator ON and
    then do the load-shedding exercise. | 	  
     ONE COULD RAISE THE SET-POINT ON AN SB-1 TO 14.4
     VOLTS WHEREUPON IT WOULD BE CAPABLE OF BATTERY
     MAINTENANCE. IN THIS CASE, YOU WOULD LEAVE THE
     AUX ALTERNATOR OFF FOR NORMAL FLIGHT, TURN ON ONLY
     AFTER AN LV WARNING PROMPTED YOU. Y0U WOULD STILL
     HAVE THE AID FOR LOAD SHEDDING . . . YOU ONLY
     GIVE UP THE AUTO-SWITCHING FEATURE THE SB-1 WAS
     DESIGNED TO SUPPORT.
 
  [quote]  	  | Quote: | 	 		    
  2. My interpretation of the Z-12 architecture indicates that in the event of a Main alternator failure, it would be the pilot’s job to manually load-shed the electrical system so that the total load was below 20A. This is because the Aux alternator would feed the Main Bus (and thence the Endurance Bus), so in the event of an Aux alternator-only operation, most of the Main Bus items would have to be turned off (or not used). My Endurance Bus will pull about 10A, so I’d like to feed the Endurance Bus directly from the Aux alternator (in addition to the normal feed path from the Main Bus). That way, I could perform a quick, pre-selected load-shed operation merely by turning off the Main Alternator switch and turning on the Aux Alternator switch. (And, of course, I’d also have the E-Bus Alternate feed from the Batt Bus, as a last-ditch backup.) So my second question is: Is this a reasonable modification to the Z-12 architecture? My goal is a simple, robust system, but I’d like the convenience and pilot friendliness of a dirt-simple “load shed” procedure, rather than a manual load-shed -- and having to ration power to the Main Bus items. | 	  
     Then you're not talking about Z-12 (originally crafted to
     be a drop-in for type certificated aircraft that (1) doesn't
     have an e-bus and (2) would be exceedingly difficult under
     FAA rules to shuffle bus structures around. The system you're
     describing looks more like this
 
   http://tinyurl.com/24j8gh4 
 
     This is a more robust version of Z-13/8 where the 20A
     alternator is installed primarily to support an electrically
     dependent engine. No e-bus is shown because if you have
     a robust second alternator, there's no likelihood of needing
     to operate battery-only . . . that's two major failures on
     a single tank of fuel. Hence the simple direct connection
     for the sb alternator to the battery such that battery
     contactor failures are covered.
   
     "Last ditch" ???? You're spending too much time worrying
     about things that only happen in Hollywood's notions of
     how airplanes work. Modern alternators properly integrated
     into your airplane are very low failure rate items.
 
     It is unlikely that you will EVER find experience a
     pressing need to drop to SB alternator or a battery-only
     ops mode over the lifetime of your airplane. In 25 years
     of working with the OBAM aviation community, I've had
     but a handful of readers report that the s/b alternator
     or e-bus ops were found useful and functioned as advertised.
 
     If the airplane you're flying now is a TC aircraft, then
     it has no e-bus, no sb alternator, might even be a rented
     airplane where you have little knowledge of and zero
     control over ship's maintenance. This has always been
     my personal situation having never owned an airplane.
    
     So when I walk up to the airplane, I do it with the
     mind set that I don't care if the electrical system
     is going to work 100.0% of the time or not. I've got
     stuff in my flight bag that will allow me to operate
     any of the airplanes I fly in "J-3 mode" with a goal
     of aviating to airport of intended destination whether
     or not anything on the panel works.
 
   http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Misc/Failure_Tolerance.pdf
 
     No matter what electrical system is installed in your
     OBAM aircraft, the stuff in your flight bag should be
     similarly selected. If you've got smelly stuff in the
     cockpit that's suspiciously like wire or electrical
     accessory smoke, you might just want to shut everything
     off, dig out the REAL stand-by goodies and keep on truck'n.
 
     Actually, I've not turned a panel mounted nav radio
     on since I purchased my first hand-held GPS in '95.
     The $100 Magellans do 99% of everything I need the
     nav radio to do . . . how far, which direction,
     and ETA.
 
     Your questions give the distinct impression that
     you don't have much trust in the hardware for which
     you're crafting an architecture. Lack of trust comes
     from some combination of three conditions:
 
     (1) You KNOW you're installing certified junk on
     an airplane constrained by regulation to be forever
     less than the best we know how to do.
 
     (2) You don't personally possess a demonstrable,
     experience-based data set the confirms the reliability
     enjoyed by the OBAM aircraft community.
 
     (3) Your understanding of the system is diluted
     with a lot of extraneous noise exemplified by the
     majority of dark-n-stormy-night stories in the
     flying rags and the nail-biter scenarios dreamed
     up by Hollywood writers to make the actors look
     like the gods of failure mitigation.
 
     If you're crafting an airplane with an electrically
     dependent engine where all the engine support
     comes from the battery bus, then Z-08 is recommended.
     If your engine is not electrically dependent
     then Z-12 as depicted is recommended.
 
     When and if that low voltage warning light ever
     comes on, know that this is NOT an emergency
     You can finish your cup of coffee and decide
     what, if anything, you plan to do about it.
     The point is, there IS A PLAN that probably
     requires repositioning less than a half dozen
     switches until the light stops flashing.
 
     Hence, I'll suggest that your quest for "dirt
     simple" responses to a "last ditch" scenario
     are probably not a good investment of emotional
     capital or time.
 
     You need to tell us more about what equipment
     is installed on what kind of engine for the
     advice to me more specific.
 
    Bob . . . [b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  |