  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		cooprv7(at)yahoo.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 1:33 pm    Post subject: Comm Antenna | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				I have been using a simple bent whip antenna on the bottom of my RV-10 for 7 years, but the signal has been getting weaker and I'm looking at upgrading.  I looked in the archives but seemed to miss a discussion that I'm sure has been made, but I was wondering how much better antennas like COMANT's CI-122 are over the significantly cheaper bent whip?  I'm using the low drag antenna on the cabin roof for COMM 2 and it works great.
 
 Thanks,
 Marcus
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:10 pm    Post subject: Comm Antenna | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				On 10/15/2013 5:28 PM, Marcus Cooper wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   
 
  I have been using a simple bent whip antenna on the bottom of my RV-10 for 7 years, but the signal has been getting weaker and I'm looking at upgrading.
 The bent whip antennas don't get 'weaker' ..... unless they're filthy.  
 | 	  
 I think something is deteriorating .... most likely a kink or bend in 
 the coax to the antenna or the connection at the antenna.  Putting an 
 expensive antenna on the bad coax won't improve things much.
 Linn
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		      I looked in the archives but seemed to miss a discussion that I'm sure has been made, but I was wondering how much better antennas like COMANT's CI-122 are over the significantly cheaper bent whip?  I'm using the low drag antenna on the cabin roof for COMM 2 and it works great.
 It's a lot of work but you might swap antennas to see what's up.
 | 	  
 Linn
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
  Thanks,
  Marcus
 
  -----
  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Bob Turner
 
 
  Joined: 03 Jan 2009 Posts: 885 Location: Castro Valley, CA
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:17 pm    Post subject: Re: Comm Antenna | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Getting weaker? Antennas don't wear out in 7 years. Is it relatively clean? I would look under the antenna for oxidation or corrosion.
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Bob Turner
 
RV-10 QB | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		aerosport1
 
 
  Joined: 07 Nov 2007 Posts: 231
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Oct 15, 2013 3:44 pm    Post subject: Comm Antenna | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Lynn 
 Have you had the com checked to see if it is ok. I had an issue with my 430 
 Nav portion. Single was getting weaker
 And weaker. Changed antennas checked everything spent 6 months chasing this and it turned out to be the
 430. The sad thing it was still in warranty when it started but by the time 
 I found it, it was out by 3 months Garmin still charged me 1000.00 to repair.
 
 Geoff Combs
 
 Sent from my iPhone
 Geoff Combs
 Aerosport Modeling
 
 On Oct 15, 2013, at 7:02 PM, Linn Walters <flying-nut(at)cfl.rr.com> wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   
  
  On 10/15/2013 5:28 PM, Marcus Cooper wrote:
 > 
 > 
 > I have been using a simple bent whip antenna on the bottom of my RV-10 for 7 years, but the signal has been getting weaker and I'm looking at upgrading.
  The bent whip antennas don't get 'weaker' ..... unless they're filthy.  I think something is deteriorating .... most likely a kink or bend in the coax to the antenna or the connection at the antenna.  Putting an expensive antenna on the bad coax won't improve things much.
  Linn
  
 >   I looked in the archives but seemed to miss a discussion that I'm sure has been made, but I was wondering how much better antennas like COMANT's CI-122 are over the significantly cheaper bent whip?  I'm using the low drag antenna on the cabin roof for COMM 2 and it works great.
  It's a lot of work but you might swap antennas to see what's up.
  Linn
 > 
 > Thanks,
 > Marcus
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > 
 > -----
 > No virus found in this message.
 > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  
  
  
  
  
  
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Geoff Combs
 
 RV-10 QB N829GW
 
Flying 500 hrs
 
40033 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		cooprv7(at)yahoo.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Oct 16, 2013 6:36 am    Post subject: Comm Antenna | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Thanks for all of the responses, pretty consistent answers so I'll check out the connections.  I've been doing some touch up work in preparation for possibly putting the airplane on the market as 4 seats just isn't enough anymore and it seemed like a good idea to upgrade the antenna if it would make a difference, but it sounds like it really wouldn't.  Hate the idea of ever letting the machine go, but the mission seems to be changing a bit  
 
 Thanks,
 Marcus
 do not archive
 --------------------------------------------
 On Tue, 10/15/13, Bob Turner <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu> wrote:
 
  Subject: Re: Comm Antenna
  To: rv10-list(at)matronics.com
  Date: Tuesday, October 15, 2013, 7:17 PM
  
  
  "Bob Turner" <bobturner(at)alum.rpi.edu>
  
  Getting weaker? Antennas don't wear out in 7 years. Is it
  relatively clean? I would look under the antenna for
  oxidation or corrosion.
  
  --------
  Bob Turner
  RV-10 QB
  
  
  
  
  Read this topic online here:
  
  http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=410654#410654
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Forum -
     - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
  List Contribution Web Site -
                -Matt
  Dralle, List Admin.
 
  |  | - The Matronics RV10-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV10-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |