 |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Eric M. Jones

Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 565 Location: Massachusetts
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:14 am Post subject: Re: Runaway trim |
|
|
A couple years ago I designed a domino-size circuit that forced the trim motor to neutralize the trim flap upon loss of power. This loss of power could have been caused either by short circuit, a blown fuse or the pilot pulling a breaker in a runaway-trim event. It is easy (maybe easier) to design a trim box circuit that reverts the trim to the "where it was some short time before" position. This seems better.
It does not, however, solve a possible failure inside the MAC/RAC trim box, or linkages, or the control surface, or the tiny control circuit itself.
I believe there exists a simple solution for those who are really worried about a stuck trim airfoil and would be satisfied with a disconnected trim airfoil--explosive bolts.
A less exciting alternative would be to arrange a cotter spring pin so that it can be extracted remotely via fishing line or actuating cable from the clevis pin that attaches the trim flap arm to the mechanism.
I agree that keeping it simple is the best approach. Backups for backups leads to a system that has unpredictable failure modes. Making sure the airplane still flies with a jammed trim is good design. Well-designed aircraft should fly with a failure of any single control or trim surface. Otherwise wear a parachute.
"...Beans for supper tonight, six o'clock.
Navy beans cooked in Oklahoma ham...
Got to eat 'em with a spoon, raw onions
and cornbread; nothing else...."
--Will Rogers
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Eric M. Jones
www.PerihelionDesign.com
113 Brentwood Drive
Southbridge, MA 01550
(508) 764-2072
emjones(at)charter.net |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
rv9jim(at)juno.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 8:33 am Post subject: Runaway trim |
|
|
Hi Eric,
You can also just put in physical limits to the trim travel. That
would give you max min. travel that could be controlled if the system
went to an extreme.
Jim Nelson
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khorton01(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 09, 2007 10:09 am Post subject: Runaway trim |
|
|
On 9 Jun 2007, at 12:29, James H Nelson wrote:
Quote: |
<rv9jim(at)juno.com>
Hi Eric,
You can also just put in physical limits to the trim
travel. That
would give you max min. travel that could be controlled if the system
went to an extreme.
|
There is certainly no point to having more trim travel than is needed
for the extreme cases in the normal flight envelope. The nose down
trim extreme case is VNE at aft CG. The nose up trim extreme case is
approach speed at forward CG. If the trim travel is greater than is
needed for these two extreme cases, it just makes the runaway
emergency even more serious, without providing any benefit during
normal operations.
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
N1DeltaWhiskey(at)comcast Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 5:56 am Post subject: Runaway trim |
|
|
Kevin,
Good point. Normally, I would tweak the trim into takeoff position which
would verify proper operation. I have a checklist item for that purpose,
but it is easy to see how actual operation of the trim setting could be
overlooked (e.g., already set at takeoff trim position)..
However, even overlooking this step would not be the equivalent of the trim
going to extreme and should be totally controllable for slow a go-around and
landing to address the problem.
Regards, Doug
---
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
khorton01(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 8:04 am Post subject: Runaway trim |
|
|
I'm not sure if I've misunderstood your intended design, or if you
have misunderstood my point.
I understood the intended design to require two switches to be
activated to make the trim move. One switch controls power to the
whole system, and the other controls the signal to the servo. The
idea is that both switches need to fail to trigger a runaway trim
(and, a wiring fault can't trigger a runaway trim, as there is no
power in the wires unless switch #1 is selected).
My concern is that if you just use the system normally, you can't
detect the failure case where switch #1 has failed in the hot
position. In this failure case, the trim will still work normally -
it will move in the selected direction, and it will only move when
switch #2 is selected. But, this failure has negated the protections
provided by this design. If you are concerned enough about runaway
trim to install this design architecture, then you should devise some
sort of periodic test to confirm that switch #1 has not failed in the
hot position. E.g., leave switch #1 in the neutral position, and
push switch #2 - the trim should not move. If the trim moves, this
tells you that switch #1 has failed in the hot position.
Kevin
On 10 Jun 2007, at 09:55, Doug Windhorn wrote:
[quote]
<N1DeltaWhiskey(at)comcast.net>
Kevin,
Good point. Normally, I would tweak the trim into takeoff position
which would verify proper operation. I have a checklist item for
that purpose, but it is easy to see how actual operation of the
trim setting could be overlooked (e.g., already set at takeoff trim
position)..
However, even overlooking this step would not be the equivalent of
the trim going to extreme and should be totally controllable for
slow a go-around and landing to address the problem.
Regards, Doug
---
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Dennis Johnson
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 89 Location: N. Calif.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 9:42 am Post subject: Runaway Trim |
|
|
I have a Ray Allen Company (RAC) trim servo on each of the three trim tabs on my Lancair Legacy. When I was doing my electrical design, I talked with one of the principals at RAC, who claimed that the design of the servo makes "runway" within the servo impossible. Since almost anything is possible, I interpreted his statement to mean that it was very unlikely.
I think the most likely way to get runaway trim in my airplane is a stuck trim switch. I expect that physically forcing the switch to the opposite position would likely unstick the switch and allow control of the trim tab until landing.
Another, less likely, cause of runway trim would be shorted wires between the electrical bus and the servo. I've tried to minimize that risk by careful termination of the wires and attention to supporting the wire bundles and preventing chafing.
I've also tried to simplify the trim systems to keep the parts count down. For example, I do not have anything to defeat the copilot's trim switch; both stick grips are "hot" all the time. I brief passengers on what the buttons on the copilot stick grip do and the need to avoid inadvertent actuation during the preflight passenger briefing. I do not have electro/mechanical relays in the system.
For my system, I feel runaway trim is a very low probability risk and that my time and energy is better focused on other, higher probability risks. However, this discussion has reminded me that I need to complete my flight testing plan to fully explore the edges of the envelope related to trim travel and controllability.
Best,
Dennis Johnson
Lancair Legacy, now flying
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
N1DeltaWhiskey(at)comcast Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:48 am Post subject: Runaway trim |
|
|
Kevin,
I think you understand the design arrangement just fine. I understood your
concern to be if the power switch failed to make contact, not get stuck in
contact as you describe below. I would agree that a simple test of the trim
switch alone should result in no action and could easily be accomplished by
quickly testing each switch individually - both should result in no trim
response.
Doug
---
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|