  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		Rowland_Carson
 
 
  Joined: 04 Jul 2008 Posts: 155 Location: Cheltenham, England
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Nov 24, 2008 11:45 am    Post subject: europe-only - pilot licensing changes | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				This is for people in Europe who will be affected by EASA's proposed 
 changes to pilot licensing. If you are outside EC jurisdiction (or if 
 you don't care what sort of licence you can have or what it will let 
 you do) you can skip the rest of this message.
 
 EASA have proposed changes to the pilot licensing system, contained 
 in Notice of Proposed Amendment 2008-17 and available for download as 
 3 PDF files from:
 
 http://www.easa.eu.int/ws_prod/r/r_npa.php
 
 Part a is an introduction; b is where the meat is; and c is mostly on 
 medicals. These documents are many pages long and will require some 
 effort to read and form comments on. You may want to focus on 
 subparts A (general), B (LPL) and C (PPL), but there are many other 
 parts worthy of attention if you can spare the time.
 
 If no-one bothers to respond we'll get what the bureaucrats think is 
 good for us. (An indication of how much they know about aviation was 
 the initial insistence during a previous rule-making exercise that 
 all balloons must have an ASI!)
 
 Note that if there's stuff you like you should say you support it, as 
 there may be other bodies objecting to it. For instance, there is 
 probably an organised campaign by AMEs to prevent the adoption of 
 simpler medical standards which would mean less/lower fees paid to 
 them! So if you like that part of the Leisure Pilot's Licence (LPL - 
 based on the UK NPPL) then say so.
 On Saturday last (22nd) I attended a seminar at Turweston on these 
 proposals and with permission reproduce the following parts of the 
 presentation about the documents and hints on how to comment 
 effectively.
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 
 Part a Explanatory Note
 General backgound - read for context
 Provides the outline structure and content of the other documents
 Contains extensive tables which cross reference every element of the 
 proposals to the JAA rules, where applicable
 
 Part b FCL
 Sub parts:
 A   General requirements
 B   Leisure Pilots Licence
 C   PPL, SPL, BPL
 D   CPL
 E   MPL (Multi-crew)
 F   ATPL
 G   Instrument Rating (IR)
 H   Class and Type Ratings
 I   Additional Ratings
 J   Instructor Certificates
 K   Examiner Certificates
 
 Part c Medical
 Sub parts:
 A   General requirements - general, issuance, revalidation, 
 renewal, revocation, suspension
 B   Requirements for medical certificates - Class 1 and 2 and LPL
 C   Requirements for aero-medical examiners
 D   Requirements for General Medical Practioners
 
 Licence proposals:
 
 PPL A:
 No significant change; 17 years; 45 hrs; (25 Dual)
 ICAO Medical Class II:up to age 40 5 years; 40 to 50 2 years; above 50 1 year
 
 LPL A Basic
 16 years; 20 hrs (10 Dual); 2000 kg + 1 person, 50 km radius
 
 LPL A
 16 years; 30 hrs (15 dual); 2000 kg + 3 persons
 
 LPL Medical
 Initial to age 45; 45 to 60 5 years; above 60 1 year
 
 
 RESPONDING TO EASA NOTICES OF PROPOSED AMENDMENT
 KEY POINTS:
 
 EASA does not respond to lobbying
 
 EASA does respond to well structured, well argued, constructive 
 formal responses to NPAs
 
 EASA will count multiple, duplicated (copied) responses as one 
 response, where it is obvious that the duplication is deliberate
 
 EASA recognises that the collective opinions of the representative 
 bodies are important and should be weighted accordingly
 
 The quantity of responses saying essentially the same thing will 
 count (as long as they are not just "photocopies" using the same 
 words)
 EFFECTIVE RESPONSES:
 
 Are brief, to the point, address the specific question or issue
 
 Provide criticism of the particular that is well argued and based on 
 the safety case / proportionality
 
 Propose alternative solutions with rational argument, briefly, with a 
 safety case
 
 Are credible
 INEFFECTIVE RESPONSES:
 
 Are rambling, long, or rude, or do not address the point
 
 Do not provide a reasoned alternative
 
 Do not provide a safety argument for the alternative
 
 Technical Aspects in responding:
 
 Your response must be made through the EASA website using the 
 'Comment Response Tool'
 
 You register first and get a unique code to enable you to go in more than once
 
 You can draft your responses off-line (and save them!) then paste 
 them into the CRT on-line
 
 You can go back and amend your responses before the comment deadline 
 (currently 15 Dec 08 for NPA 17 but expected to be extended further, 
 shortly)
 
 DON'T LEAVE RESPONDING TO THE LAST MINUTE - IT IS A TIME-CONSUMING PROCESS
 
 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 
 As you can see there's only a few weeks before the deadline (and 
 don't bank on it being extended!). The presenter on Saturday was 
 David Roberts of the British Gliding Association (BGA) and he told us 
 that the corporate response of the BGA is published on their website 
 (sorry, haven't had time to look up the full URL for that, but Google 
 is your friend in this sort of situation) so you might want to have a 
 look at that to see how they have approached it. As noted above, do 
 NOT copy and paste from it into your response. EASA are now using a 
 very sohisticated software tool to analyse responses and lump 
 together all those with identical wording, which then count as just 
 one response.
 
 There is probably further advice and indications of their response on 
 the LAA website but again I haven't looked yet.
 
 Note that the ratings part of the proposal includes Mountain ratings 
 which are only for French & Swiss Altiports. Strange that these 
 country-specific ratings should have found their way in while the UK 
 IMC rating did not! There are moves afoot to remedy this, but if you 
 say anything about the need for a "starter" Instrument Rating, please 
 do not push it as the "British solution" - this will not help your 
 argument as there is a certain amount of "not invented here" syndrome 
 to overcome. Push it instead purely on its safety merits.
 
 Please pass this message on to any other UK pilots who may not be on 
 this forum.
 
 regards
 
 Rowland
 -- 
 | Rowland Carson  LAA #16532    http://home.clara.net/rowil/aviation/
 | 1160 hours building Europa #435 G-ROWI  e-mail <rowil(at)clara.net>
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 1:43 pm    Post subject: europe-only - pilot licensing changes | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi! Rowland,
 I personally would like to thank you for your time and effort in
 attending and reporting on the pilot licensing changes you have detailed
 below.
 Three times I have sat and tried to read through and understand the
 specific detail and fallen asleep! IMHO Let's face it these bureaucrats
 would prefer us not to fly at all, the juggling has left me in such
 state of mind for it to be impossible to reply to them without being
 rude. You must be aware of my political leanings on such control from
 Europe so I find it no surprise to know of their intent. This is just
 another frustration of us not being able to control our own destiny and
 I deplore their interference. As much as I've enjoyed my flying for such
 few years I find my self feeling sorry for younger generations needing
 to dodge through all the regulations that now beset us. Further I need
 some serious convincing that so called "consultation" is anything but a
 sop for them to say that we had a hand in the ultimate way the industry
 is allowed to be aligned into their control. I simply do not believe
 that they lend any power to our representations. I see this kind of
 disease being applied to how local councils are run .....and as for
 "planning applications"........
 Now you see I'm ranting and anything further I have to say would be
 considered worthless as indeed they would deplore what I say anyway.
 In other words for me to attempt to make a representation would probably
 undo someone else's constructive work even if this note doesn't anyway!
 Regards
 
 Bob Harrison.
  
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |