Matronics Email Lists :: View topic

Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists

Get Email Distribution Too! FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Register

Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

video

Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author Message

lcottrell

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Jordan Valley, Or

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 10:36 am Post subject: video

http://vimeo.com/user7640649/videos

  

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYjvxXpC_j0

  

 I have been using You Tube for my video's. The quality  improved when Google bought it, but now they are really particular about using  sound tracks to the point that you are better off just leaving it with no sound  or the monotonous sound of engines. Some may like it but unless I am in the  airplane it is annoying to me. As one friend said, " if you want to hear engine  noise, turn on an electric razor while it is playing". Anyway that has bothered  me. I know that I have actually bought music that I have enjoyed on certain  video's. Possum with Dido for a sound track caused me to buy one of  them.

  

 The same friend piqued my interest in Vimeo. He is using  HD, but he also has a faster upload speed than I do, but the quality was  outstanding. I decided to try it. I went for an afternoon flight yesterday just  to get some raw video to compare. I have resisted HD simply because It would  take forever for me to upload anything, but I did want to see how Vimeo worked.  It seems to be a bit more friendly. The tutorials that are available for the  different movie makers are very handy.

  

 The upload time is about the same, but to me the quality  of Vimeo is a bit better. Not a lot, but lighter it seems to me. I ran both  side by side to compare. If I can just use a sound track, that alone would make  it better.

 Happy and safe Forth!

 Larry

  

 Note: If you forward this email, please delete the  forwarding history, which includes my email address.

   [quote][b]

_________________
do not archive

henry.voris

Joined: 02 Mar 2007
Posts: 116
Location: Pueo Field, Kula, Maui

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 10:45 am Post subject: Re: video

Thanks for the video... I prefer the music.



Aloha

_________________
Henry
Firefly Five-Charlie-Bravo

Do Not Archive

by0ung(at)q.com
Guest

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:01 pm Post subject: video

The upload time is about the same, but to me the quality  of Vimeo is a bit better. Not a lot, but lighter it seems to me. I ran both  side by side to compare. If I can just use a sound track, that alone would make  it better.

 Happy and safe Forth!

 Larry

  

  

 I could not tell much difference in the  video.....   the vimeo  played in a larger hd screen mode.   that was nice,  the music was good as well.

  

 boyd  

  

 do not archive



   [quote][b]

slyck(at)frontiernet.net
Guest

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 12:47 pm Post subject: video

The vimeo loads faster but is obviously more pixilated at big screen.   Perhaps you can find some generic elevator music.  

BB



On 2, Jul 2011, at 2:33 PM, Larry Cottrell wrote:

 	  Quote: 	
		  http://vimeo.com/user7640649/videos

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYjvxXpC_j0

 

I have been using You Tube for my video's. The quality improved when Google bought it, but now they are really particular about using sound tracks to the point that you are better off just leaving it with no sound or the monotonous sound of engines. Some may like it but unless I am in the airplane it is annoying to me. As one friend said, " if you want to hear engine noise, turn on an electric razor while it is playing". Anyway that has bothered me. I know that I have actually bought music that I have enjoyed on certain video's. Possum with Dido for a sound track caused me to buy one of them.

 

The same friend piqued my interest in Vimeo. He is using HD, but he also has a faster upload speed than I do, but the quality was outstanding. I decided to try it. I went for an afternoon flight yesterday just to get some raw video to compare. I have resisted HD simply because It would take forever for me to upload anything, but I did want to see how Vimeo worked. It seems to be a bit more friendly. The tutorials that are available for the different movie makers are very handy.

 

The upload time is about the same, but to me the quality of Vimeo is a bit better. Not a lot, but lighter it seems to me. I ran both side by side to compare. If I can just use a sound track, that alone would make it better.

Happy and safe Forth!

Larry

 

Note: If you forward this email, please delete the forwarding history, which includes my email address.

 	  Quote: 	
		  



href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com

href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/contribution



	


	


 [quote][b]

rmurrill(at)cox.net
Guest

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 2:39 pm Post subject: video

I canâ€™t detect much visual difference on my screen, but I do miss the  elegant Native American / Canyon People music used on some of your videos which  was a superb match for the landscapes you shared with us....

 Bob

  

  

  From:  Larry  Cottrell (lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com) 

   Sent: Saturday, July 02, 2011 11:33 AM

 To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com (kolb-list(at)matronics.com) 

 Subject: video



   http://vimeo.com/user7640649/videos

  

 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYjvxXpC_j0

  

 I have been using You Tube for my video's. The quality  improved when Google bought it, but now they are really particular about using  sound tracks to the point that you are better off just leaving it with no sound  or the monotonous sound of engines. Some may like it but unless I am in the  airplane it is annoying to me. As one friend said, " if you want to hear engine  noise, turn on an electric razor while it is playing". Anyway that has bothered  me. I know that I have actually bought music that I have enjoyed on certain  video's. Possum with Dido for a sound track caused me to buy one of  them.

  

 The same friend piqued my interest in Vimeo. He is using  HD, but he also has a faster upload speed than I do, but the quality was  outstanding. I decided to try it. I went for an afternoon flight yesterday just  to get some raw video to compare. I have resisted HD simply because It would  take forever for me to upload anything, but I did want to see how Vimeo worked.  It seems to be a bit more friendly. The tutorials that are available for the  different movie makers are very handy.

  

 The upload time is about the same, but to me the quality  of Vimeo is a bit better. Not a lot, but lighter it seems to me. I ran both side  by side to compare. If I can just use a sound track, that alone would make it  better.

 Happy and safe Forth!

 Larry

  

 Note: If you forward this email, please delete the  forwarding history, which includes my email address.

[quote]



href="http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

href="http://forums.matronics.com">http://forums.matronics.com

href="http://www.matronics.com/contribution">http://www.matronics.com/c

[b]

lcottrell

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Jordan Valley, Or

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 3:11 pm Post subject: video

yeah, You tube is a stickler for music. Since I wanted to  use the exact same video for comparison, I used some of the sample music that  came on the computer. 

 Larry

  

 Note: If you forward this email, please delete the forwarding history,  which includes my email address.

 [quote]   ---

_________________
do not archive

ces308

Joined: 03 Nov 2008
Posts: 317
Location: houghton lake ,mi

Posted: Sat Jul 02, 2011 7:46 pm Post subject: Re: video

Nice video,Larry ! Thats my kind of flying !



chris ambrose

M3X/Jabiru A-2200

N327cs

pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com
Guest

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 1:02 am Post subject: video

Hi,

 great flying pics as usual, not much between the  quality. As far as the `music` is concerned someone should point out to the  `musicians`  there are more than 4 notes available to them.

 Personally I woud rather listen to an electric  razor. Thank heaven for the volume control.

  

 Pat

   [quote][b]

Dana

Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 1047
Location: Connecticut, USA

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 5:19 am Post subject: video

Have they changed their policy again then?  Youtube was a problem with music a while ago, then they apparently worked something out, with "buy this song" links on most videos with music.  It would suck if they changed back to the old policy again, as a well chosen music track can really add a lot to a video.  

 

 -Dana



Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com> wrote:[quote]  yeah, You tube is a stickler for music. Since I wanted to  use the exact same video for comparison, I used some of the sample music that  came on the computer. 

 Larry

  

 Note: If you forward this email, please delete the forwarding history,  which includes my email address.

 [quote]   ---

lcottrell

Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Jordan Valley, Or

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:01 am Post subject: video

I think Google ( which owns them) got some threats about  lawsuits over copyright infringement and started to crack down. I tend to listen  when warnings are in red. Before there were some artists that they would not  allow you to use, and they would block the music. The last one that I tried  before, they cancelled the upload. I can't remember the artist.

  

 To our resident Englishman:  Just to get a comparison  that was the same with both uploads I used a sample that was supplied on my  computer. I did not listen to it, nor did I prefer that type of "music", but I  was sure that it would not cause and legal repercussions.  Not sure that it  matters, some don't like the drum and flute music, others think it fits the  country, others complain that there is no engine noise.  Oh well, It was  worth what you paid for it.

  

 I tried to go out today and explore some mountains south  of us. I decided to abort due to the winds. At ground level there is no wind,  but 200 to 1000 feet off the ground there is a 20 mile headwind, and there would  be rotors over the Mts. I don't want to fly too low as there are Pot farms back  in the folds of the hills. The illegal's have had some really big "farms" back  in there. Being slow I make a really good target. Another day.

 Larry

  

 Note: If you forward this email, please delete the forwarding history,  which includes my email address.

 [quote]   ---

_________________
do not archive

rlaird

Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 373
Location: Houston

Posted: Sun Jul 03, 2011 8:51 am Post subject: video

While not ideal, there IS public domain music.  Just go to Google and type in "public domain music" and you'll get lots of things to investigate.



On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 10:58 AM, Larry Cottrell <lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com (lcottrell1020(at)gmail.com)> wrote:

  	  Quote: 	
		         I think Google ( which owns them) got some threats about  lawsuits over copyright infringement and started to crack down. I tend to listen  when warnings are in red. Before there were some artists that they would not  allow you to use, and they would block the music. The last one that I tried  before, they cancelled the upload. I can't remember the artist.

 



	




  [quote][b]

_________________
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Robert Laird
formerly: MkIIIc w/ 912ULS & Gyrobee
current: Autogyro Cavalon w/ 914ULS
Houston, TX area
http://www.Texas-Flyer.com

Display posts from previous:

	Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List	All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum