nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:15 am    Post subject: Capacitive Fuel Level Sensor - How   do they  work? | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  I believe the capacitive probe will be linear over its length as 
 well; it won't "know" about the cross sectional area of the tank at 
 any given sensing point, just whether or not fuel is present there.
 
 | 	  
    True for off-the-shelf probes . . . wherein the designer
    has no first-hand knowledge of tank geometry for the
    proposed installation. It is possible to build a capacitive
    probe that presents an output that is not linear with
    relation to liquid level. This patent speaks to some
    examples:
 
 http://tinyurl.com/6ogp4ve
 
 The advantage may be that a long capacitive probe can extend through 
 a tank designed such that a float type sensor, on one end or the 
 other, will 'range out', because when one end of the tank is full, 
 the other end is still not full, or vice versa.  It's also possible, 
 though difficult, to custom bend a capacitive probe so that there's 
 more range (flatter slope) in greater cross-sectional areas of the 
 tank, and less range (steeper slope) in smaller areas of the tank; 
 that tends to linearize the output.  But it's a tough thing to 
 accomplish with high resolution.
 
     Until the micro-controller came along.
 
     The last trade study I did for HBC spoke to a system with
     a self calibrating feature. You put the signal
     conditioner for a pure linear probe into a calibrate
     mode, put unusable fuel in tank and then tell the
     signal conditioner "this is zero fuel". Then fill
     the tank with 10% steps for capacity stopping each
     time to tall the signal conditioner to "remember
     this value as x%" ending up at 100% or full.
 
     When taken out of the calibrate mode, the signal
     conditioner does a linear interpolation of the
     fuel level across the constellation of calibrated
     data points to offer a very close representation
     of available fuel irrespective of tank and probe
     geometry.
 
     The approach to sensing and signal conditioning
     would produce a device that's adaptable to virtually
     any airplane and combination of probes.
 
     This produces a gage that is "too accurate" in
     that substantial uncertainty in calibration points
     is introduced by dielectric constant of various
     loads of fuel and temperatures. The "ultimate"
     system includes a calibration probe at the bottom
     of the tank that is always submerged and offers
     the signal conditioner a real-time sample of
     variables for that particular load of fuel.
 
     The electronics becomes so simple that it costs
     more to build an install a sturdy set of probes
     in something like a Hawker 4000 than the
     electronics which processes data from those
     probes! Bill of materials for the electronics
     came in at about $10 in production lots.
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  In the 80's in process instrumentation industry, there were a number 
 of well-designed (non-interactive adjustment) signal conditioners, 
 for under $100, that had three or four linearization adjustments 
 across an input range.
 
 | 	  
     I took a whack at such a device for Cessna about
     that time. They were proposing a spring cartridge
     in the elevator controls that could be 'wound up'
     to offer a constant stick-force-per-G under the range
     of flight conditions of airspeed and CG. Made my
     head get real tight! The last iteration drove
     a non linear cam to 'get the curve'. The system
     we proposed never made it into the airplane.
     Don't recall how they solved the problem.
 
     A couple years later, we (Electro-Mech) did what
     I belive is the first micro-processor driven trim
     system that flew on the aborted Mooney M30 program.
     This did use the lookup table I described
     for fuel level signals to drive the pivot location
     actuator for a servo/anti-servo tab.
 
     That showed more promise but the project got
     canceled (prototype missed target weights by
     about 500 pounds!). In any case, it proved the
     future utility of software for slaying such
     dragons.
 
    Bob . . .
 
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  |