  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 1:11 am    Post subject: 912s vs. Jabiru 3300 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  But the Rotax has the problems often talked about on our site. 
 Thrown carbs, shaking start, cracks and stuff.  It just makes me 
 think the Jabber is a bit better.
 
 | 	  
 Anyone following the light sport category developments of the last 
 few years will note that the Rotax 912 and 912S dominate the field. 
 There are also certified aircraft (such as the Diamond Katana) flying 
 behind certified versions of the 912.  There must be a reason they 
 are so popular with manufacturers.
 
 I am no expert on the Jabirus but from what I have heard from members 
 of the Desert Fox Squadron, the 4-stroke Rotax engines are lighter, 
 produce more thrust, and burn less fuel.  Murle Williams told me 
 today of a couple of friends of his that had 912-powered 'foxes that 
 flew with a Jabiru-powered 'fox of the same model and configuration 
 on a cross country trip.  The Rotax-powered planes had to slow down 
 by about 10 mph for the Jabiru to keep up and when they landed, the 
 latter took on significantly more fuel.
 
 There is no perfect solution to any problem, and the 912 family is 
 not perfect either.  But the problems mentioned above all have 
 solutions and I'm sure the 3300 has problems as well.
 
 As for me, my last 'fox had a 912S and the next one will as well.  My 
 Model IV-1200 with Ivo medium prop could launch in 120 feet (solo), 
 sustain a 40 degree climb angle, hit Vne (140 mph) in level flight, 
 and sipped gas like it was something expensive...wait...I guess it 
 is.  Empty weight came in at 660 pounds.
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  I simply want to have a few more ponies than 100 so I can get a bit 
 more cruise out of the airplane...
 
 | 	  
 Additional horsepower is not what you need to increase your cruise 
 speed, it's additional thrust.  More horsepower MIGHT give you more 
 thrust but it depends upon a lot of other factors as well.
 
 As with all opinions, this one is worth what you paid for it.   
 
 Mike G.
 N728KF
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		Michel
 
  
  Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 966 Location: Norway
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 2:15 am    Post subject: 912s vs. Jabiru 3300 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:09 AM, Michael Gibbs wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   from what I have heard from members of the Desert Fox Squadron, the 
  4-stroke Rotax engines are lighter, produce more thrust, and burn less 
  fuel.
 
 | 	  
 I don't know, Mike, since I never had a 912 but I think it would be 
 strange that a Rotax, with its gearbox and water cooling system is 
 lighter than a Jabiru. My fuel consumption at cruise speed (Kitfox 3) 
 is about 12 liters per hour. How does that compare to a 80 HP Rotax? 
 Here is an interesting link from UK:
 
 http://www.sportair.co.uk/cgi-bin/Page87L2.htm
 
 Cheers,
 Michel
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  _________________ Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		darinh
 
 
  Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 327 Location: Utah
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:04 pm    Post subject: Re: 912s vs. Jabiru 3300 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Michel,
 
 My last Fox (Model III like yours) had the 80 hp 912 and it burned right around what you are getting with the 2200...about 3-3.5 gph at 75%.
 
 Mike,
 
 I understand that it is thrust that give you speed but as you said this is dependent on a whole lot more than your engine's power.  It depends very much on the prop as well.  That is why I am trying to figure out if the Jabiru is compatible with an in-flight adjustable prop.  If so, I would think that you could get very good use out of the extra 20 hp by adjusting the prop and hence getting a bit more speed out of the airplane.  I appreciate your input and as stated, have no problems with the 912 (I have owned one and loved it and will most likely go with another for this kit) I simply want to explore my options and I figure you guys can help me make and informed decision.
 
 Can anyone out there give me some real life data on a Series 7 with a 912S and an IFA prop?  What kind of cruise do you see?...How about climb rates?  Keep in mind that I am in Utah (4500' msl) so the sea level data doesn't mean much to me.  I would like to find someone who has flown in and out of say...the Idaho backcountry with the setup mentioned.  Anybody got any numbers...?
 
 Thanks,
 
 Darin
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:37 pm    Post subject: 912s vs. Jabiru 3300 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Darin,
 
 You sure know how to stir things up.  People here
 marry their engines like they do their planes. 
 Luckily you didn't ask which was better, a Fox or a
 Rans.   
 
 Someone here has a 3300 on a Fox, but I forgot who.
 
 I am not an owner of either engine choice, so I hope
 impartial.
 
 John McBean sells some inflight adjustables props and
 has some good data on them, if he is around and has
 the time to share.  I think he has been flying with
 them himself.
 
 I think it is the weight and stiffness or resonance of
 the prop that is the issue with the Jabbers.  The
 first engines had cranks that were too light for some
 of the props people tried.  I think that was fixed,
 but a light weight prop is still required.
 
 You have the extra HP from the 3300, even with the
 greater fixed pitch prop loss.  If you can use an
 adjustable, it should be a great performer.  Closer to
 a  914 at much less price and repair costs.
 
 The Roo 3300 is certainly a simpler installation to
 work on, assuming you can remove the ducting easily.
 
 Kurt S.  S-5/NSI turbo/CAP
 
 --- darinh <gerns25(at)netscape.net> wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   Michel,
  
  My last Fox (Model III like yours) had the 80 hp 912
  and it burned right around what you are getting with
  the 2200...about 3-3.5 gph at 75%.
  
  Mike,
  
  I understand that it is thrust that give you speed
  but as you said this is dependent on a whole lot
  more than your engine's power.  It depends very much
  on the prop as well.  That is why I am trying to
  figure out if the Jabiru is compatible with an
  in-flight adjustable prop.  If so, I would think
  that you could get very good use out of the extra 20
  hp by adjusting the prop and hence getting a bit
  more speed out of the airplane.  I appreciate your
  input and as stated, have no problems with the 912
  (I have owned one and loved it and will most likely
  go with another for this kit) I simply want to
  explore my options and I figure you guys can help me
  make and informed decision.
  
  Can anyone out there give me some real life data on
  a Series 7 with a 912S and an IFA prop?  What kind
  of cruise do you see?...How about climb rates?  Keep
  in mind that I am in Utah (4500' msl) so the sea
  level data doesn't mean much to me.  I would like to
  find someone who has flown in and out of say...the
  Idaho backcountry with the setup mentioned.  Anybody
  got any numbers...?
  
  Thanks,
  
  Darin
 
 | 	  
 __________________________________________________
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 12:38 pm    Post subject: 912s vs. Jabiru 3300 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Michel,
 
 --- Michel Verheughe <michel(at)online.no> wrote:
 
 ..............
 
 Good link and story.  I do think the engines are
 almost equal and you have to go with the little
 preferences, or less price.
 
 Kurt S.
 
 __________________________________________________
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		darinh
 
 
  Joined: 20 Apr 2006 Posts: 327 Location: Utah
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2006 5:46 pm    Post subject: Re: 912s vs. Jabiru 3300 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho wrote: | 	 		  Darin,
 
 You sure know how to stir things up.  People here
 marry their engines like they do their planes. 
 Luckily you didn't ask which was better, a Fox or a
 Rans.    | 	  
 
 I guess they do but I wouldn't be so ignorant to ask such a thing as which was better a Fox or a Rans...the answer is obvious isn't it?   ...I love the Rotax...just looking at options.
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  
 You have the extra HP from the 3300, even with the
 greater fixed pitch prop loss.  If you can use an
 adjustable, it should be a great performer.  Closer to
 a  914 at much less price and repair costs. | 	  
 
 That would be exactly what I am looking for!  Just don't know if it is compatible with the IFA props.  I will talk to Jabiru tomorrow.
 
 Darin
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Jul 03, 2006 1:25 pm    Post subject: 912s vs. Jabiru 3300 | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Darin sez:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		  Can anyone out there give me some real life data on a Series 7 with 
 a 912S and an IFA prop? What kind of cruise do you see?...How about 
 climb rates?
 
 | 	  
 I have reams of such data, but they are from my Model IV-1200.  Let 
 me know if you'd like me to look it up for you.
 
 Mike
 
  |  | - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |