Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

RG400 Splice

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
n4zq(at)verizon.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 5:43 am    Post subject: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

I may have a need to lengthen two of the four antenna cables to my Ryan TCAD9900B by approximately 6”.
Short of fabricating an extension with connectors on each end, would it be preferable to splice directly to the existing cables?

Thanks

N4ZQ


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
billp(at)wwpc.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Aug 02, 2015 7:51 am    Post subject: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

If you can't find 6" of slack to pull from somewhere in the airframe
you're stuck. You might be able to reroute the cables to get the extra 6".

Here's a whole lot of technical reasons why you should replace all your
cables (not splice them) if that's what you need to do;

1) According to the installation manual all four cables MUST be the same
length. Changing the length of just two of the cables is going to make
target bearing inaccurate. The TCAD uses signal arrival time (phase) to
determine the bearing to the target. changing a cables length will
change the length of time it takes a signal to get through that cable
retaliative to the time the same signal takes to get through the other
cables.

The cables need to have 3.0 dB of loss +/-0.5 dB. The TCAD uses relative
signal strength to determine the range to the target. Without using
connectors it is nearly impossible to keep a constant impedance. A
soldered splice just won't work well at these frequencies. In addition,
the reflections caused by the impedance mismatch is going to add
additional loss and may create ghost aircraft. I'm not sure about the
ghosts but seems like a possibility given what the TCAD is trying to do.
Splicing the additional cable will add 4 more connectors per cable. Good
quality connectors rated for operation at these frequencies that are
properly installed will add about 0.11 dB per connector for a total of
0.44 dB. Getting real close to the 0.5 dB tolerance you have in the spec
for the cables. Of course you don't know how much of that tolerance (or
in which direction, + or -) has been used by the original installer. The
installation manual doesn't talk about fabricating these cables but
rather lists prefabricated cable sets that are compatible. My guess that
they want the cables manufactured and tested as a set with a network
analyzer so that they know that the cables are of equal length
(electrical phase-wise) and equal loss at the 3 dB spec.

Piecing out the cable length with homemade extensions seems like a bad
idea to me. You're taking a very expensive piece of avionics and
sacrificing it's accuracy for the price of a new cable set.

Bill

On 8/2/15 06:42, Greenbacks, UnLtd. wrote:
Quote:


I may have a need to lengthen two of the four antenna cables to my Ryan TCAD9900B by approximately 6”.
Short of fabricating an extension with connectors on each end, would it be preferable to splice directly to the existing cables?

Thanks

N4ZQ




- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Eric M. Jones



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 565
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Mon Aug 03, 2015 5:44 am    Post subject: Re: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

Quote:
I may have a need to lengthen two of the four antenna cables to my Ryan TCAD9900B by approximately 6”. Short of fabricating an extension with connectors on each end, would it be preferable to splice directly to the existing cables? N4ZQ


I'd follow Bill's suggestions, but if it absolutely has to be lengthened there are connectors to do it properly. There are good You Tube videos online regarding this.

But whatever you do, remember that the RF signal is carried in the insulation, NOT the center conductor nor the shield! This makes all other joining schemes problematic.

See my attached "Dabbling with Electricity" for this and other matters.


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



Dabbling with electricity.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  Dabbling with electricity.pdf
 Filesize:  139.87 KB
 Downloaded:  332 Time(s)


_________________
Eric M. Jones
www.PerihelionDesign.com
113 Brentwood Drive
Southbridge, MA 01550
(508) 764-2072
emjones(at)charter.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
donjohnston



Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 2:13 pm    Post subject: Re: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

Quote:
But whatever you do, remember that the RF signal is carried in the insulation, NOT the center conductor nor the shield!


This is the kind of stuff that makes my head explode. Sad

You're saying the signal is carried by the thing that is not supposed to conduct electricity?

And I'm not doubting you. It's just that makes as much sense (to me) as my car battery being jammed full of AAA's. Laughing


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eric M. Jones



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 565
Location: Massachusetts

PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 3:56 pm    Post subject: Re: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

Quote:
You're saying the signal is carried by the thing that is not supposed to conduct electricity? Don Johnson


The signal (which is obviously the important stuff) is DRIVEN by the "wave guide" which is the metal parts, but transmitted inside the wave guide...which is the insulation. It turns out that the wave velocity is exactly the same as the speed of light inside the insulating material-- Vacuum, Teflon or PE for example.

I point this out to make sure that builders understand the reason for proper termination (which includes joints) of the coaxial cable. I can't be "pig-tailed" at high frequencies without enormous loss of signal strength. At low frequencies (like audio) it just doesn't matter.

Electricity is strange. Please read my "Dabbling with Electricity".


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

_________________
Eric M. Jones
www.PerihelionDesign.com
113 Brentwood Drive
Southbridge, MA 01550
(508) 764-2072
emjones(at)charter.net
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
edpav8r(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Aug 05, 2015 4:19 pm    Post subject: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

Not quite, Don. It's actually full of AA's. There are two of these...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzgDffMcsUU
...in every 12V car battery.
And every AA is actually a stack of coin cells in a plastic wrapper! Wink
Eric
do not archive


On Aug 5, 2015, at 6:13 PM, "donjohnston" <don(at)velocity-xl.com (don(at)velocity-xl.com)> wrote:

Quote:
It's just that makes as much sense (to me) as my car battery being jammed full of AAA's. [Laughing]



- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
donjohnston



Joined: 13 Dec 2009
Posts: 231

PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2015 3:12 am    Post subject: Re: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

Those videos are great.

This is what prompted my statement.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s_8n2Qgguto


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:11 am    Post subject: RG400 Splice Reply with quote

At 06:56 PM 8/5/2015, you wrote:
Quote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Eric M. Jones" <emjones(at)charter.net>


> You're saying the signal is carried by the thing that is not supposed to conduct electricity? Don Johnson


The signal (which is obviously the important stuff) is DRIVEN by the "wave guide" which is the metal parts, but transmitted inside the wave guide...which is the insulation. It turns out that the wave velocity is exactly the same as the speed of light inside the insulating material-- Vacuum, Teflon or PE for example.

There is no parallel between coaxial transmission
lines and waveguide.

Transmission lines are metallic conductors with
predictable surge impedance and velocity factor
that is constant with frequency.

Waveguides are as their name suggests, pipes
for the conduct of electromagnetic energy,
a constriction of free space that allows one
to direct the energy from the antenna (a little
radiator at one end of the 'pipe' over some
distance and around corners before it is launched
into free space . . . usually at the focal point of
some reflective dish.

A wave traversing the length of a guide literally
reflects from wall-to-wall and in a manner that
is influenced by the size and shape of the guide
with respect to the operating frequency. Waveguide
also exhibits a 'velocity factor' which is a function
size and operating frequency. As one squirts energy
down a wave guide in lower frequencies, the velocity
factor increases until at some lower limit (cutoff
frequency) the velocity factor is for all practical
purposes infinite and no energy makes it down the
pipe.

Coax cable exhibits no such characteristic in
that it's a conductor constrained within a die-electric
and waveguide is a simple constriction of free space.
Losses in waveguide and coax are separate operators.



Bob . . . [quote][b]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group