  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 8:13 am    Post subject: Battery Charger/Maintainers | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 03:37 PM 3/15/2019, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com>
 
  Odyssey batteries are often prematurely aged by keeping on a battery maintainer. If you contact Odyssey they can give you a rejuvenation protocol to restore the battery to near full capacity. | 	    Color me skeptical about battery failures
    on "maintainers" . . .
 
    There was some discussion flying around the
    av-circles over 10 years ago wherein readers
    reported that Odyssey 'banned' certain brands
    of maintainers . . . Battery Tender included.
 
    I was mystified by this. I had been using
    Battery Tenders and Battery Minders on
    lab batteries for years with no observable
    problems . . . the point of a maintainer is
    to boost the voltage on a fully charged
    battery to some point just above it's
    open circuit resting voltage. The rationale
    says that one wants to transfer internal
    parasitic discharge loads from the CHEMISTRY
    to an EXTERNAL source.
 
    My maintainers always sat at about 13.1 to
    13.4 volts after their run-up during
    charge.
 
  [img]cid:.0[/img]
 
  [img]cid:.1[/img]
 
  
  During a battery failure investigation for Raytheon-
  Beech, I had occasion to query a Hawker-Enersys engineer
  about this topic.
 
  He had no knowledge of any perceived
  problems with the wall-warts vs. Odyssey products . . .
  those issues were addressed in a different 
  division of Enersys.
 
  I continued to use my trusty constellation of
  wall-warts with pleasing results.
 
  I note that Odyssey has their own flavor of
  battery charger. See  https://tinyurl.com/y67jy8tb
 
  It offers a charging profile that looks like this: 
 
  [img]cid:.0[/img]
 
  A search of the 'net revealed several products
  featuring 4 to 7 stages of charging. Who wuda thunk
  it? I wondered if that 'auto maintain' profile
  was dictated by Odyssey . . . or simply popped
  up as a feature in a charger they are re-branding.
 
  The 'storage recondition mode' is also a puzzle.
  It has the look and smell of a pulsed energy
  profile intended to 'break up' lead sulfide 
  crystals. I've seen countless articles on battery
  de-sufation with near miraculous claims for
  having preserved or recovering a trashed lead-acid
  battery.
 
  
  Check out this article at Battery University:
 
   https://tinyurl.com/y2kdehzt
 
  The comments are worth reading too. Note that
  one comment that cites dozens of patents
  on de-sulfation technology wherein the
  inventor claims all previous patents are
  inadequate or worthless.
 
  I note that this document on the Odyssey
  website . . .
 
   https://tinyurl.com/y429aqbj
 
  speaks of SVLA battery recovery process
  that calls for several cycles of discharge
  to 10v, charge and top off at 14.7 followed
  by float at 13.6.  Those numbers have been
  around for nearly 30 years. To date, I've
  not learned of any useful deviations.
 
  Just for grins, I ordered this latest-n-greatest
  version of a Battery Minder
 
   https://tinyurl.com/y32cjfvv
 
  
  So forgive me if, in the absence of any
  engineering test documentation, I am 
  reluctant to embrace any notion that
  there's really something new under the
  sun in battery chargers.  I'll keep
  y'al posted on the super-whippy Battery
  Tender.
 
  
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  |  I'm at about 4 years on my Odyssey 925 in the Aridzona heat, and still working fine. | 	  
    Have you cap-checked the battery recently?
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
	
  
	 
	
	
		
	 
	
		|  Description: | 
		
			
		 | 
	 
	
		|  Filesize: | 
		 93.46 KB | 
	 
	
		|  Viewed: | 
		 2736 Time(s) | 
	 
	
		
  
 
  | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	
	
		
	 
	
		|  Description: | 
		
			
		 | 
	 
	
		|  Filesize: | 
		 95.57 KB | 
	 
	
		|  Viewed: | 
		 2736 Time(s) | 
	 
	
		
  
 
  | 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		skywagon185(at)gmail.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 9:28 am    Post subject: Battery Charger/Maintainers | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Thanks Bob for these details. . .
 Confirms my use of these little maintainers over the last 15+ years on both autos and planes.
 Looking forward to your review of the "latest" Battery Tender especially what the "pulsed" energy is really doing as mentioned in the ad....
 
 On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 9:19 AM Robert L. Nuckolls, III <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com (nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com)> wrote:
 
  	  | Quote: | 	 		    At 03:37 PM 3/15/2019, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Kelly McMullen <kellym(at)aviating.com (kellym(at)aviating.com)>
 
  Odyssey batteries are often prematurely aged by keeping on a battery maintainer. If you contact Odyssey they can give you a rejuvenation protocol to restore the battery to near full capacity. | 	    Color me skeptical about battery failures
    on "maintainers" . . .
 
    There was some discussion flying around the
    av-circles over 10 years ago wherein readers
    reported that Odyssey 'banned' certain brands
    of maintainers . . . Battery Tender included.
 
    I was mystified by this. I had been using
    Battery Tenders and Battery Minders on
    lab batteries for years with no observable
    problems . . . the point of a maintainer is
    to boost the voltage on a fully charged
    battery to some point just above it's
    open circuit resting voltage. The rationale
    says that one wants to transfer internal
    parasitic discharge loads from the CHEMISTRY
    to an EXTERNAL source.
 
    My maintainers always sat at about 13.1 to
    13.4 volts after their run-up during
    charge.
 
  [img]cid:1698cac2aecaba1f4971[/img]
 
  [img]cid:1698cac2aecad56cd362[/img]
 
  
  During a battery failure investigation for Raytheon-
  Beech, I had occasion to query a Hawker-Enersys engineer
  about this topic.
 
  He had no knowledge of any perceived
  problems with the wall-warts vs. Odyssey products . . .
  those issues were addressed in a different 
  division of Enersys.
 
  I continued to use my trusty constellation of
  wall-warts with pleasing results.
 
  I note that Odyssey has their own flavor of
  battery charger. See  https://tinyurl.com/y67jy8tb
 
  It offers a charging profile that looks like this: 
 
  [img]cid:1698cac2aecaba1f4971[/img]
 
  A search of the 'net revealed several products
  featuring 4 to 7 stages of charging. Who wuda thunk
  it? I wondered if that 'auto maintain' profile
  was dictated by Odyssey . . . or simply popped
  up as a feature in a charger they are re-branding.
 
  The 'storage recondition mode' is also a puzzle.
  It has the look and smell of a pulsed energy
  profile intended to 'break up' lead sulfide 
  crystals. I've seen countless articles on battery
  de-sufation with near miraculous claims for
  having preserved or recovering a trashed lead-acid
  battery.
 
  
  Check out this article at Battery University:
 
   https://tinyurl.com/y2kdehzt
 
  The comments are worth reading too. Note that
  one comment that cites dozens of patents
  on de-sulfation technology wherein the
  inventor claims all previous patents are
  inadequate or worthless.
 
  I note that this document on the Odyssey
  website . . .
 
   https://tinyurl.com/y429aqbj
 
  speaks of SVLA battery recovery process
  that calls for several cycles of discharge
  to 10v, charge and top off at 14.7 followed
  by float at 13.6.  Those numbers have been
  around for nearly 30 years. To date, I've
  not learned of any useful deviations.
 
  Just for grins, I ordered this latest-n-greatest
  version of a Battery Minder
 
   https://tinyurl.com/y32cjfvv
 
  
  So forgive me if, in the absence of any
  engineering test documentation, I am 
  reluctant to embrace any notion that
  there's really something new under the
  sun in battery chargers.  I'll keep
  y'al posted on the super-whippy Battery
  Tender.
 
  
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  |  I'm at about 4 years on my Odyssey 925 in the Aridzona heat, and still working fine. | 	  
    Have you cap-checked the battery recently?
 
  
    Bob . . .
    | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
	
  
	 
	
	
		
	 
	
		|  Description: | 
		
			
		 | 
	 
	
		|  Filesize: | 
		 93.46 KB | 
	 
	
		|  Viewed: | 
		 2732 Time(s) | 
	 
	
		
  
 
  | 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	
	
		
	 
	
		|  Description: | 
		
			
		 | 
	 
	
		|  Filesize: | 
		 95.57 KB | 
	 
	
		|  Viewed: | 
		 2732 Time(s) | 
	 
	
		
  
 
  | 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Mar 17, 2019 10:58 am    Post subject: Battery Charger/Maintainers | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 12:24 PM 3/17/2019, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  Thanks Bob for these details. . .
  Confirms my use of these little maintainers over the last 15+ years on both autos and planes.
  Looking forward to your review of the "latest" Battery Tender especially what the "pulsed" energy is really doing as mentioned in the ad.... | 	  
   It may take awhile . . . I read a testimonial
   on this product wherein the writer claimed
   to have 'recovered a trashed battery to
   good as new'. Of course, there was no
   quantitative analysis of performance
   in the recovered battery . . . I suspect
   that it started and engine but capacity
   never checked.
 
   Out here in oil-patch-and-cowpie-country,
   there is a virtual mountain test subjects
   available to test . . . but the writer
   of the review did confess that he left
   the whizzy maintainer on for 90 days!
 
   We'll see . . .
 
  
  
    Bob . . .
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |