  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2022 9:52 am    Post subject: Thermocouples: grounded or   ungrounded | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 11:13 AM 7/5/2022, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Paul Eckenroth" <jeckenroth(at)nbn.net>
 
  Thanks for the reply Bob.  Unfortunately my GRT EFIS cannot read Thermocouples except as used for EGT and CHT.  Therefore I am using small inexpensive readers off Amazon.  I seriously doubt if they have any specialized circuitry other than that require to give a basic reading of the thermocouple.  Does the ground loop have the potential of rendering the reading totally unusable or is it more like a 5% loss of accuracy.  The ungrounded probes are around twice as expensive as the grounded probes.  I would certainly be willing to consider a better reader if it can be had in a small format.  The Onex is a single seat very small plane with limited panel space.  Thanks for your help. | 	  
    Okay, best bet is go grounded thermocouples PLUS
    take your power ground wire for the instrument(s)
    out to some handy spot on engine.
 
    Got a link for these probes?
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
    Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
    survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
    out of that stuff?"
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2022 4:17 pm    Post subject: Thermocouples: grounded or   ungrounded | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 03:53 PM 7/5/2022, you wrote:
  
    Okay, how do you plan to attach the probes to the
    stator . . . bolts? We used to weasel small t/c
    wires under the stator windings of a motor.
    How many total points to you plan to monitor?
    Have you considered a single instrument and rotary
    selector switch to manually scan through the
    array of thermocouples?
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
    Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
    survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
    out of that stuff?"
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		chaskuss(at)yahoo.com Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Tue Jul 05, 2022 4:31 pm    Post subject: Thermocouples: grounded or   ungrounded | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Paul, do you have a GRT EIS to go with your EFIS? If so, the EIS has the capability to have auxiliary inputs added. You can hook additional thermocouples to take temperature of other items on the aircraft using those auxiliary inputs.
 
 Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
  
   	  | Quote: | 	 		    On Tue, Jul 5, 2022 at 6:11 PM, Robert L. Nuckolls, III
 <nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com> wrote:
  
     At 11:13 AM 7/5/2022, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  --> AeroElectric-List message posted by: "Paul Eckenroth" <jeckenroth(at)nbn.net>
 
  Thanks for the reply Bob.  Unfortunately my GRT EFIS cannot read Thermocouples except as used for EGT and CHT.  Therefore I am using small inexpensive readers off Amazon.  I seriously doubt if they have any specialized circuitry other than that require to give a basic reading of the thermocouple.  Does the ground loop have the potential of rendering the reading totally unusable or is it more like a 5% loss of accuracy.  The ungrounded probes are around twice as expensive as the grounded probes.  I would certainly be willing to consider a better reader if it can be had in a small format.  The Onex is a single seat very small plane with limited panel space.  Thanks for your help. | 	  
    Okay, best bet is go grounded thermocouples PLUS
    take your power ground wire for the instrument(s)
    out to some handy spot on engine.
 
    Got a link for these probes?
 
  
     Bob . . .
 
    Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
    survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
    out of that stuff?"
    
  
  
  | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Wed Jul 06, 2022 6:14 pm    Post subject: Thermocouples: grounded or   ungrounded | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 05:30 PM 7/6/2022, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  | Plan to attach two thermocouples to the stator with the stator attachment bolts.  There is also a thermocouple imbedded in one of the generator coils by Revmaster, but the lead wires are solid and extremely thin so I'm not anticipating a long life.  I will also attach a thermocouple to the voltage regulator.  The most important temperature readings will be of the stator.  Unfortunately since I can't run the readings through the EFIS, I will not have an alarm.I will look into a rotary switch.  The grounds on my plane are all connected to 2 forest of tabs fore and aft on the firewall with a #4 wire to the engine, so I think that connecting the reader ground to this grounding point would be the same as connecting directly to the engine.   | 	  
  Suggestion attached . . .
 
  
  
    Bob . . .
 
    Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
    survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
    out of that stuff?"
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
	
  
	 
	
	
		
	 
	
		|  Description: | 
		
			
		 | 
		  Download | 
	 
	
		|  Filename: | 
		 9814_Thermocouple_Switch_R0.pdf | 
	 
	
		|  Filesize: | 
		 225.09 KB | 
	 
	
		|  Downloaded: | 
		 279 Time(s) | 
	 
	 
	 
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2022 11:20 am    Post subject: Thermocouples: grounded or   ungrounded | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				 	  | Quote: | 	 		  | The most important temperature readings will be of the stator. | 	  
     yeaaahhh . . . sort of. Temperature numbers of the stator
     stack adjacent to mounting bolts will be greatly
     influenced by heat transfer to the crankcase.
 
     We know that the stator failures are generally limited
     to one pole. How do the wires look on remaining poles?
     To precipitate this 'isolated' failure suggests a thermal
     runaway event where the resistance of copper rises with
     temperature which in turn, increases energy dissipated in
     the wires. I.e. a positive feedback for temperature
     excursion.
 
     To catch a pending failure suggest a need to monitor
     each winding . . . unless field experience shows that
     failures are concentrated.
 
     In any case, other temperatures around the system's
     components may be interesting data but I'm skeptical
     as to their ability to flag impending failure any
     one coil.
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
    Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
    survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
    out of that stuff?"
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2022 9:17 am    Post subject: Thermocouples: grounded or   ungrounded | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				At 04:04 PM 7/8/2022, you wrote:
   	  | Quote: | 	 		  Bob
  I agree with what you are saying concerning the ideal method of monitoring the coils.
  However I need to work with what I have and I don't think I can monitor 12 individual
  coils with the tools at my disposal. | 	  
   Previous examples of failure involved but a single coil of the
   5.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I seem to recall that Revmaster
   presently splits the TEN alternator stator poles into two groups . . .
   rated at 18A each.
 
   Okay, this is the first photo I recall seeing of a total-toasting
   of all 5 coils on the Revmaster alternator. This suggest a different
   failure mode. Bad R/R? Too much system loads? Probably
   something different than conditions the precipitates
   a single pole conflagration.
 
   The difference in coil failures suggests at least two,
   different operational stresses.
 
   It would be interesting to know the rational behind the
   'dual alternator' decision. History shows us that capability
   of the individual half-alternators is marginal.
 
   Has anyone considered a single winding spread over all
   ten pole pieces wound with fewer turns of heavier wire
   to produce a single alternator of say 20, 25A . . .
   or more?
 
   If the two existing windings are reasonably matched,
   they could be operated in parallel as a single winding.
   Watts dissipated is proportional to I(squared) x R. So 
   dropping current in each winding by one half reduces
   heat generated in that winding by 75%.
 
   That offers greater value in stress reduction than
   adding cooling air.  
 
  I do plan on using your idea of the rotary switch and I appreciate the schematic.  I thought all might be interested in a picture of the stator after removal.  The one coil suffered catastrophic damage with the phenolic spacer completely destroyed by the heat.  I have machined the case to allow more ventilation and will add two blast tubes directly at the coils.  And hope for the best.
 
  
 
  
    Bob . . .
 
    Un impeachable logic: George Carlin asked, "If black boxes
    survive crashes, why don't they make the whole airplane
    out of that stuff?"
 
  |  | - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
  
 | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |