  | 
				Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists   
				 | 
			 
		 
		 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic   | 
	 
	
	
		| Author | 
		Message | 
	 
	
		tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.c Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 3:53 am    Post subject: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Gidday,
 In the process of deciding if my 914 powered conventional undercarriage Taildragger should or will need the battery to go down the back, beside the tail plane counterbalance containment tower. If not, I can use the mount that I have built back there for a Trigg transponder remote unit mount. Also, in the not too distant future if I decide on putting the battery back there, well I'll need to run big cabling too before my top goes on, hopefully mid year. Any thought much appreciated.
 Tony Renshaw
 Sydney Aussie
 Sent from my iPad
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		rparigoris
 
 
  Joined: 24 Nov 2009 Posts: 808
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 8:35 am    Post subject: Re: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Tony
 
 My XS mono has a 914. It also has a Airmaster CS prop and second B+C alternator.
 
 On a mono ground handling is much improved if you are not near the forward CG.
 
 I chose to put a Odyssey PC545 way aft mounted:
 http://www.europaowners.org/main.php?g2_itemId=30710
 with #4 copper clad aluminium wire.
 I calculated and you save just about one pound using #4 copper clad aluminium over #4 copper.
 One downside to aluminium clad wire is it work hardens very easy and the strands are larger than #4 tefzel wire. Thus bend it and it breaks a lot easier. Think gentle bends and good strain relief.
 
 I also added weight to the front of my stabilators that will reduce load to the drive pins and weight required on the mass balance arm by ~ 15%. Thus 3 pounds of weight only cost me 2.2 pounds. This negates needing to add dead weight to the sternpost.
 
 Ron Parigoris
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		richard collings
 
 
  Joined: 08 Jul 2011 Posts: 73 Location: warwickshire england
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 9:23 am    Post subject: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Tony, do as much as you can before you glue the top on that's forward and 
 aft , I spent a month doing the interior fitting carpet, side panels etc and 
 putting the head lining in was an absolute bugger.
 I have my battery fitted in the back under the luggage floor on starboard 
 side with Trigg transponder on the port. Access to both is important and 
 easy. I used 4 gauge wire to the firewall, and have no problems so far.
 Best of luck
 Richard
 
 --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.c Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 12:33 pm    Post subject: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Hi Richard, 
 Thanks for that. I have made a shelf for the battery under the Stbd floor stowage of the baggage bay, if I commit to it, but had not thought of needing access to the transponder unit so was going to keep it down the back with the antenna, and keep the high power cable run short between antenna and unit. Re the battery, it seems like I either consider a lead acid sealed cell battery like my Odyssey PC 680 at 7 kg on the pax footwell, or under baggage bay floor, or I could use a Lithium Polymer Haijiu at less tha 1 kg up front on the footwell. Because I have the 914 and electric fuel pumps, I could even have a dual battery setup at less than 2 kg! The Haijiu another builder has used to crank his 912 S for 4 years.
 Regards
 Tony Renshaw
 Sydney Aussie
 
 Sent from my iPad
 
 [quote] On 15 Feb 2014, at 4:22 am, "richard" <rcollings(at)talktalk.net> wrote:
  
  
  
  Hi Tony, do as much as you can before you glue the top on that's forward and aft , I spent a month doing the interior fitting carpet, side panels etc and putting the head lining in was an absolute bugger.
  I have my battery fitted in the back under the luggage floor on starboard side with Trigg transponder on the port. Access to both is important and easy. I used 4 gauge wire to the firewall, and have no problems so far.
  Best of luck
  Richard
  
  --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		davidjoyce(at)doctors.org Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2014 1:18 pm    Post subject: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Tony, Although I agree entirely with doing as much as you 
 sensibly can before sticking the lid on, I would not 
 include battery fittings in this. It is more convenient by 
 far and saves a deal of weight if your battery can be 
 fitted forward (i.e. against the firewall above passenger 
 feet, where it needs only minimal strapping & structure to 
 fix it). The notion of delibrately looking to have an aft 
 C of G seems to me misguided - the further aft the more 
 readily a plane will spin. Where you need your C of G to 
 be is where any possible loading ofsmall pilot/big pilots; 
 full fuel/no fuel; full luggage/no luggage still leaves 
 within limits. I would advise leaving deciding on battery 
 location until you ve done a trial weighing with other key 
 components including paint completed. By all means work 
 out how you will run wiring and solidly fix battery in 
 either location, but do not commit. For what it is worth 
 my mono/914/Woodcomp wobbly prop has worked out extremely 
 well with a forward battery.
 Regards, David Joyce, GXSDJ
 
 On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:31:57 +1100
   Tony Renshaw <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com> wrote:
 [quote] 
 <tonyrenshaw268(at)gmail.com>
  
  Hi Richard, 
  Thanks for that. I have made a shelf for the battery 
 under the Stbd floor stowage of the baggage bay, if I 
 commit to it, but had not thought of needing access to 
 the transponder unit so was going to keep it down the 
 back with the antenna, and keep the high power cable run 
 short between antenna and unit. Re the battery, it seems 
 like I either consider a lead acid sealed cell battery 
 like my Odyssey PC 680 at 7 kg on the pax footwell, or 
 under baggage bay floor, or I could use a Lithium Polymer 
 Haijiu at less tha 1 kg up front on the footwell. Because 
 I have the 914 and electric fuel pumps, I could even have 
 a dual battery setup at less than 2 kg! The Haijiu 
 another builder has used to crank his 912 S for 4 years.
  Regards
  Tony Renshaw
  Sydney Aussie
  
  
  
  Sent from my iPad
  
 > On 15 Feb 2014, at 4:22 am, "richard" 
 ><rcollings(at)talktalk.net> wrote:
 > 
 > 
 ><rcollings(at)talktalk.net>
 > 
 > Hi Tony, do as much as you can before you glue the top 
 >on that's forward and aft , I spent a month doing the 
 >interior fitting carpet, side panels etc and putting the 
 >head lining in was an absolute bugger.
 > I have my battery fitted in the back under the luggage 
 >floor on starboard side with Trigg transponder on the 
 >port. Access to both is important and easy. I used 4 
 >gauge wire to the firewall, and have no problems so far.
 > Best of luck
 > Richard
 > 
 > --
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		JonathanMilbank
 
 
  Joined: 14 Apr 2012 Posts: 397 Location: Aberdeen area
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 7:54 am    Post subject: Re: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Tony, I agree with David Joyce and furthermore while my aircraft was a mono-wheel for 16 years, I did temporarily move the battery from the engine bay to inside the rear fuselage. My old classic has the baggage bay bulkhead further forward.
 
 I and three experienced friends who share my aircraft all agreed that having the C of G further aft was a mistake, because the tendency to swing off runway direction on landing was noticeably worse.
 
 Having the original very direct steering tail-wheel under the fin gave us immediate feedback to directional control issues on the ground, which can be masked by the springy links in the more recently extended tail-wheel design.
 
 I know this for sure because I did the first test flights for a friend's 914 mono-wheel aircraft and have flown it for several hours subsequently. Please take the advice to keep the C of G mid-range or a little forward. You won't risk it nosing over when applying the brake as long as you keep the stick fully back. The tail-planes are very powerful.
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		grahamsingleton(at)btinte Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Sun Feb 16, 2014 3:03 pm    Post subject: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Makes sense Tony,
 but make sure you get the full 13deg. up elevator.
 Graham
 
         From: jonathanmilbank <jdmilbank(at)yahoo.co.uk>
  To: europa-list(at)matronics.com 
  Sent: Sunday, 16 February 2014, 15:54
  Subject: Re: 914 battery location.
   
  
 --> Europa-List message posted by: "jonathanmilbank" <jdmilbank(at)yahoo.co.uk (jdmilbank(at)yahoo.co.uk)>
 
 Tony, I agree with David Joyce and furthermore while my aircraft was a mono-wheel for 16 years, I did temporarily move the battery from the engine bay to inside the rear fuselage. My old classic has the baggage bay bulkhead further forward.
 
 I and three experienced friends who share my aircraft all agreed that having the C of G further aft was a mistake, because the tendency to swing off runway direction on landing was noticeably worse.
 
 Having the original very direct steering tail-wheel under the fin gave us immediate feedback to directional control issues on the ground, which can be masked by the springy links in the more recently extended tail-wheel design.
 
 I know this for sure because I did the first test flights for a friend's 914 mono-wheel aircraft and have flown it for several hours subsequently. Please take the  advice to keep the C of G mid-range or a little forward. You won't risk it nosing over when applying the brake as long as you keep the stick fully back. The tail-planes are very powerful.
 
 
 Read this topic online here:
 
 http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.pmatronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List" ="http://forums.matronics.com/" target="_blank">http://forums.matronics                     tronics.com/contribution" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contri================
  
   
   
  [quote][b]
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		davidjoyce(at)doctors.org Guest
 
 
 
 
 
  | 
		
			
				 Posted: Mon Feb 17, 2014 1:29 am    Post subject: 914 battery location. | 
				     | 
			 
			
				
  | 
			 
			
				Tony, Have just got back from skiing to be able to lay 
 hands on my C of G data:
           I adjusted my C of G to be at 59" AOD and that 
 allows any combination of pilot wt 120 to 400lbs/ Fuel 0 
 to 110 lbs/ baggage 0 to 80 lbs to give C o G within the 
 58 - 62.5" range. The precise calculations will depend on 
 your empty wt ( that is a heavy pilot will not shift the C 
 o G so far in a heavy plane). It means that I never have 
 to do any calculations of wt & balance and do not risk 
 flying out of safe balance range. So I would suggest 59" 
 is an ideal figure to aim at, and would be interested to 
 hear any contrary views.
         Regards, David
 On Sun, 16 Feb 2014 22:59:53 +0000 (GMT)
   GRAHAM SINGLETON <grahamsingleton(at)btinternet.com> wrote:
  	  | Quote: | 	 		   Makes sense Tony,
  but make sure you get the full 13deg. up elevator.
  Graham
  
  
  
  
  ________________________________
  From: jonathanmilbank <jdmilbank(at)yahoo.co.uk>
  To: europa-list(at)matronics.com 
  Sent: Sunday, 16 February 2014, 15:54
  Subject: Re: 914 battery location.
  
  
  
 <jdmilbank(at)yahoo.co.uk>
  
  Tony, I agree with David Joyce and furthermore while my 
 aircraft was a mono-wheel for 16 years, I did temporarily 
 move the battery from the engine bay to inside the rear 
 fuselage. My old classic has the baggage bay bulkhead 
 further forward.
  
  I and three experienced friends who share my aircraft 
 all agreed that having the C of G further aft was a 
 mistake, because the tendency to swing off runway 
 direction on landing was noticeably worse.
  
  Having the original very direct steering tail-wheel 
 under the fin gave us immediate feedback to directional 
 control issues on the ground, which can be masked by the 
 springy links in the more recently extended tail-wheel 
 design.
  
  I know this for sure because I did the first test 
 flights for a friend's 914 mono-wheel aircraft and have 
 flown it for several hours subsequently. Please take the 
 advice to keep the C of G mid-range or a little forward. 
 You won't risk it nosing over when applying the brake as 
 long as you keep the stick fully back. The tail-planes 
 are very powerful.
  
  
  
  
  Read this topic online here:
  
  http://forums.matronics.co=                              
 -Matt Dralle=========
 
 | 	 
 
 
  |  | - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - |  |   |  Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
 
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |  
  |  
 
 
 
 
  | 
			 
		  | 
	 
	
		| Back to top | 
		 | 
	 
	
		  | 
	 
	
		 | 
	 
 
  
	 
	    
	   | 
	
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
  | 
   
 
  
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
  
		 |